Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: GENERAL ALUMINUM MFG. COMPANY

Referral inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of GENERAL ALUMINUM MFG. COMPANY in 5159 SOUTH PROSPECT STREET, RAVENNA, OH 44266 (NAICS 331524). OSHA activity number 345338164.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch General Aluminum MFG. Company — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for General Aluminum MFG. Company is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
5159 SOUTH PROSPECT STREET
City
RAVENNA
State
OH
ZIP
44266
Mailing
5159 SOUTH PROSPECT STREET, RAVENNA, OH 44266
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
331524
Employees
233
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.119 D

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 233 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2021
Abate by
May 11, 2023
Penalty
Initial $10,728 · Current $14,502
29 CFR  1910.119(d):The employer did not complete a compilation of written process safety information pertaining to the equipment in the process.  On or about May 28, 2021, where sulfur dioxide (liquid) was present in quantities greater than 1000 pounds, the employer did not complete a compilation of written process safety information pertaining to the hazards of the highly hazardous chemicals used or produced by the process, the technology of the process, and  the equipment in the process exposing employees to hazards associated with sulfur dioxide.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $14502
  • — C (S) $10728
  • — Z (S) $10728

1910.119 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 233 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2021
Abate by
May 11, 2023
Penalty
Initial $10,728 · Current $14,502
29 CFR  1910.119(e)(1):The employer did not perform an initial process hazard analysis (hazard evaluation) on processes covered by 29 CFR 1910.119:  On or about May 28, 2021, where sulfur dioxide (liquid) was present in quantities greater than 1000 pounds, the employer did not perform an initial process hazard analysis (PHA).  Lack of a PHA results in an employer not adequately identifying, evaluating, and controlling the hazards of the process, exposing employees to hazards associated with sulfur dioxide.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $14502
  • — C (S) $10728
  • — Z (S) $10728

1910.119 F01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 233 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2021
Abate by
May 11, 2023
Penalty
Initial $10,728 · Current $14,502
29 CFR  1910.119(f)(1): The employer did not develop and implement written operating procedures that provided clear instructions for safely conducting activities involved in each covered process consistent with the process safety information  addressing at least the elements listed in 1910.119(f)(1)(i)(A)-1910.119(f)(1)(iv):  On or about May 28, 2021, where sulfur dioxide (liquid) was present in quantities greater than 1000 pounds, the employer did not develop and implement written operating procedures which outline items (i) through (iv) of 1910.119(f)(1). Lack of operating procedures consistent with the requirements of the PSM standard can result in equipment malfunction, failure, or chemical release exposing employees to hazards associated with sulfur dioxide.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $14502
  • — C (S) $10728
  • — Z (S) $10728

1910.119 G03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 233 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2021
Abate by
May 11, 2023
Penalty
Initial $10,728 · Current $14,502
29 CFR  1910.119(g)(3): The employer did not ascertain that each employee involved in operating a process has received and understood the training required by this paragraph and did not prepare a record which contains the identity of the employee, the date of training, and the means used to verify that the employee understood the training.    On or about May 28, 2021, where sulfur dioxide (liquid) was present in quantities greater than 1000 pounds, the employer did not ensure that training on an overview of the process and in operating procedures outlined in 1910.119(f) was conducted and documented. Lack of training and subsequent verification and documentation exposes employees to hazards associated with sulfur dioxide in the event of equipment failure or leaks in the system.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $14502
  • — C (S) $10728
  • — Z (S) $10728

1910.119 J02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 233 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2021
Abate by
May 11, 2023
Penalty
Initial $10,728 · Current $14,502
29 CFR  1910.119(j)(2):The employer did not establish written procedures to maintain the on-going integrity of process equipment:  On or about May 28, 2021, where sulfur dioxide (liquid) was present in quantities greater than 1000 pounds, the employer had not developed and implemented written procedures to maintain the ongoing integrity of process equipment, such as for equipment including, but not limited to the Silvan Industries Liquid Surge Tank (sn: 485411) and the Kunkle Safety Relief Valve 910. Lack of mechanical integrity procedures/inspections can result in equipment failures and loss of containment, exposing employees to hazards associated with sulfur dioxide.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $14502
  • — C (S) $10728
  • — Z (S) $10728

1910.119 L01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 233 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2021
Abate by
May 11, 2023
Penalty
Initial $10,728 · Current $14,502
29 CFR  1910.119(l)(1):The employer did not establish written procedures to manage changes to process chemicals, technology, equipment, and procedures, and changes to facilities that affect a covered process:  On or about May 28, 2021, where sulfur dioxide (liquid) was present in quantities greater than 1000 pounds, the employer had not developed and implemented written procedures to manage changes to process chemicals, technology, equipment, and procedures; and changes to   facility that affect a covered process. Lack of management of change procedures could result in equipment failures and loss of containment due to failure to: assess the impact of changes, update operating procedures with any changes, to update changes to process safety information, and to train employees on the proposed changes, exposing employees to hazards associated with sulfur dioxide.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $14502
  • — C (S) $10728
  • — Z (S) $10728

1910.119 N

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 233 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2021
Abate by
May 11, 2023
Penalty
Initial $10,728 · Current $14,502
29 CFR  1910.119(n):The employer did not establish an emergency action plan for the entire plant in accordance with the provisions of 29 CFR 1910.38:  On or about May 28, 2021, where sulfur dioxide (liquid) was present in quantities greater than 1000 pounds, the employer had not developed and implemented written emergency action plan in accordance with 1910.38 in that their existing plan lacked procedures for reporting a fire or other emergency, procedures to be followed by employees who remain to operate critical plant operations before they evacuate, procedures to be followed by employees performing rescue or medical duties, the name or job title of every employee who may be contacted by employees who need more information about the plan or an explanation of their duties under the plan, as well as procedures for handling small releases.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $14502
  • — C (S) $10728
  • — Z (S) $10728

1910.120 Q01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 233 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2021
Abate by
May 11, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.120(q)(1):The employer did not develop and implement an emergency response plan to handle anticipated emergencies prior to commencement of emergency response operations:  On or about May 28, 2021, where employees are expected to respond to emergencies involving the plant's sulfur dioxide blending system, the employer had not developed and implemented a written emergency response plan.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.120 Q08 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2021
Abate by
May 11, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.120(q)(8)(ii): A statement of the training or competency of each employee was not made:   On or about May 28, 2021, the employer did not ensure that statements were made of annual training or competency for each employee involved in emergency response for the sulfur dioxide system.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View General Aluminum MFG. Company's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345338164.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.