Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: HI NABOR SUPERMARKET, LLC

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of HI NABOR SUPERMARKET, LLC in 5383 JONES CREEK ROAD, BATON ROUGE, LA 70817 (NAICS 445110). OSHA activity number 345339253.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch HI Nabor Supermarket, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for HI Nabor Supermarket, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
5383 JONES CREEK ROAD
City
BATON ROUGE
State
LA
ZIP
70817
Mailing
5383 JONES CREEK ROAD, BATON ROUGE, LA 70817
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
445110
Employees
80
Ownership type
A

1 citation on file for this inspection.

1904.4 A

Other-than-serious 6 instances 80 exposed
Issued
Jul 23, 2021
Abate by
Aug 12, 2021
Penalty
Initial $1,366 · Current $820 Reduced
29 CFR  1904.4(a): The employer did not record each work-related fatality, injury or illness case that resulted in the general recording criteria on the OSHA Form 300 or equivalent:  On or about June 2, 2021, the employer did not record the following workplace injuries or illnesses on the OSHA Form 300 or equivalent for the calendar year 2020:  a) An employee experienced a work-related respiratory illness in June 2020 resulting in days away from work, and the employer did not record it on the OSHA form 300 or equivalent for the calendar year 2020.  b) An employee experienced a work-related respiratory illness in April 2020 resulting in days away from work, and the employer did not record it on the OSHA form 300 or equivalent for the calendar year 2020.  c) An employee experienced a work-related respiratory illness in June 2020 resulting in days away from work, and the employer did not record it on the OSHA form 300 or equivalent for the calendar year 2020.  d) An employee experienced a work-related respiratory illness in June 2020 resulting in days away from work, and the employer did not record it on the OSHA form 300 or equivalent for the calendar year 2020.  e) An employee experienced a work-related respiratory illness in an undocumented month in 2020 resulting in days away from work, and the employer did not record it on the OSHA form 300 or equivalent for the calendar year 2020.  f) An employee experienced a work-related respiratory illness in October 2020 resulting in days away from work, and the employer did not record it on the OSHA form 300 or equivalent for the calendar year 2020.  g) An employee experienced a work-related respiratory illness in June 2020 resulting in days away from work, and the employer did not record it on the OSHA form 300 or equivalent for the calendar year 2020,
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $819.6
  • — Z (O) $1366

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345339253.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.