Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
3,913,242Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: FORCE CONTRACTOR CORP.

Unprogrammed Other inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Other safety inspection of FORCE CONTRACTOR CORP. in LOT 5 ASPIRE @ FORK LANDING DEVELOPMENT, FELTON, DE 19943 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 345345987.

Watch Force Contractor Corp. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Force Contractor Corp. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
LOT 5 ASPIRE @ FORK LANDING DEVELOPMENT
City
FELTON
State
DE
ZIP
19943
Mailing
2715 WELSH RD. APT. 3B, PHILADELPHIA, PA 19152
Inspection type
Unprogrammed Other (I)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.178 L01 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4505.00 · Current $4505.00
29 CFR  1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l) (Construction reference 1926.602(d)  a) Lot 5 in the Aspire at Fork Landing development Felton, DE 19943: On or about June 1, 2021, the employer failed to provide training to employees operating powered industrial trucks to lift sheeting material to the roof to conduct framing activities with employees on the wood supported by the tines.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4505

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3862.00 · Current $3862.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1):  The employer did not develop, implement, and maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g), & (h) of this section for labels and other forms of warning, safety data sheets, and employee information and training will be met, and which also includes items (i) and (ii) of this subparagraph:  a) Lot 5 in the Aspire at Fork Landing development Felton, DE 19943: On or about June 1, 2021, the employer did not provide or maintain a hazardous communication program to include labels and other forms of warning, safety data sheets, and employee information and training as required.  ABATEMENT NOTE:  A written program shall include description of how the criteria for the following will be met:  1.  Labeling and other forms of warning; 2.  Material Safety Data Sheets; 3.  Employee information and training  Additionally, a list of hazardous chemicals known to be preset in the workplace must be compiled.  Methods used to inform employees of the hazards associated with non-routine tasks and the informing of contractors of workplace hazards, including a description of the labeling system used in the facility and of the availability of material safety data sheets, must also be addressed.  The written program must be made available upon request.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3862

1910.1200 E01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i): The employer did not compile a list of the hazardous chemicals known to be present using a product identifier that was referenced on the appropriate safety data sheet.  a) Lot 5 in the Aspire at Fork Landing development Felton, DE 19943: On or about June 1, 2021, the employer did not develop nor maintain a chemical inventory list identifying the hazardous chemicals being used by their employees.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  a) Lot 5 in the Aspire at Fork Landing development Felton, DE 19943: On or about June 1, 2021, the employer did not provide training on hazardous chemicals to be used on the site nor did the employer provide SDS sheets for the employees to reference in case their was an exposure.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.150 C01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2575.00 · Current $2575.00
29 CFR  1926.150(c)(1)(i):  A fire extinguisher, rated not less than 2A, was not provided for each 3,000 square feet of the protected building area, or major fraction thereof and the travel distance from any point of the protected area to the nearest fire extinguisher exceeded 100 feet:  a) Lot 5 in the Aspire at Fork Landing development Felton, DE 19943: On or about June 1, 2021, the employer did not provide a working/usable fire extinguisher at the site where employees were required to use flammable fuels to perform their required daily duties.  The fire extinguisher that was on the roof with the employees had not been inspected and was fully depleted at the time of the inspection.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2575

1926.416 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2575.00 · Current $2575.00
29 CFR  1926.416(e)(1):  Worn or frayed electric cords or cables were used:  a) Lot 5 in the Aspire at Fork Landing development Felton, DE 19943: On or about June 1, 2021, employees were permitted to use multiple flexible cords' that had damaged ends and melted exterior insulation that exposed inner insulated conductors
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2575

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $4505.00 · Current $4505.00
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet or more above lower levels was not protected by a guardrail system, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, or an alternative fall protection measure that meets a provision described in paragraph (b) of this section:  a) Lot 5 in the Aspire at Fork Landing development Felton, DE 19943: On or about June 1, 2021, the employer failed to ensure employees conducting framing work on a steep roof while being unprotected in all directions, approximately 21 feet above the lower level, were provided adequate fall protection.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4505

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4505.00 · Current $4505.00
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not train each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards to enable them to recognize fall hazards and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  a) Lot 5 in the Aspire at Fork Landing development Felton, DE 19943: On or about June 1, 2021, the employer did not train each employee exposed to a fall hazard to properly recognize and minimize fall hazards.  Abatement Note: The training program must enable the employees to recognize the hazards of falling and must train each employee in the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards.  Each employee must be trained by a competent person in the following: 1. The nature of fall hazards in the work area; 2. The correct procedures for erecting, maintaining, disassembling, and inspecting the fall protection systems to be used; 3. The use and operation of guardrail systems, personal fall arrest systems, safety net systems, warning line systems, safety monitoring systems, controlled access zones, and other protection to be used; 4. The role of each employee in the safety monitoring system when this system is used; 5. The limitations on the use of mechanical equipment during the performance of roofing work on low-sloped roofs; 6. The correct procedures for the handling and storage of equipment and materials and the erection of overhead protection; 7. The role of employees in fall protection plans; 8. The standards contained in this subpart. The employer must verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written certification record that will contain the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4505

View FORCE CONTRACTOR CORP.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345345987.