Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: YAMAHA MARINE SYSTEMS COMPANY INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of YAMAHA MARINE SYSTEMS COMPANY INC. in 5625 WEST CLINTON AVENUE, MILWAUKEE, WI 53223 (NAICS 326199). OSHA activity number 345360879.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Yamaha Marine Systems Company INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Yamaha Marine Systems Company INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
5625 WEST CLINTON AVENUE
City
MILWAUKEE
State
WI
ZIP
53223
Mailing
5625 WEST CLINTON AVENUE, MILWAUKEE, WI 53223
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
326199
Employees
63
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.140 C16

Other-than-serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jul 23, 2021
Abate by
Dec 9, 2021
Penalty
Initial $11,605 · Current $6,000 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.140(c)(16):(16) Personal fall protection systems and their components must be used exclusively for employee fall protection and not for any other purpose, such as hoisting equipment or materials.  (a) On or about July 1, 2021, the employer did not ensure that the personal fall protection system attached to the jib/hoist (with underhung hoist), located at the rotational plastic molds station/press #5 , was used solely for fall protection. This exposed employees to a fall hazard of approximately 6 feet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $6000
  • — Z (S) $11605

1910.212 A03 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 23, 2021
Abate by
Aug 11, 2021
Penalty
Initial $11,605 · Current $8,000 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.212(a)(3)(ii):The point of operation of machines whose operation exposes an employee to injury, shall be guarded. The guarding device shall be in conformity with any appropriate standards therefor, or, in the absence of applicable specific standards, shall be so designed and constructed as to prevent the operator from having any part of his body in the danger zone during the operating cycle.  (a) On or about July 1, 2021 the employer did not ensure that the unused portion of the blade on the Rockwell Model 14 Band Saw blade was guarded. This exposed employees to amputation hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $8000
  • — Z (S) $11605

1910.219 F03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 23, 2021
Abate by
Sep 9, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.219(f)(3):Sprockets and chains. All sprocket wheels and chains shall be enclosed unless they are more than seven (7) feet above the floor or platform. Where the drive extends over other machine or working areas, protection against falling shall be provided. This subparagraph does not apply to manually operated sprockets.  (a) On or about July 1, 2021, the employer did not ensure the sprocket and chain assembly on the cooling arm of press #2 was guarded. This exposed employees to caught-in/entanglement hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.212 A01

Deleted Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 23, 2021
Abate by
Sep 9, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.212(a)(1):Types of guarding. One or more methods of machine guarding shall be provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. Examples of guarding methods are-barrier guards, two-hand tripping devices, electronic safety devices, etc.  (a) On or about July 1, 2021, the employer did not ensure the mold spindles of press #2 were guarded to prevent employees from accessing the danger zone while the machine was in operation. This exposed employees to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345360879.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.