KANSAS CITY, MO —
OSHA Inspection: MAGNUM COMPANIES
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of MAGNUM COMPANIES in 3536 NICHOLSON AVENUE, KANSAS CITY, MO 64120 (NAICS 484110). OSHA activity number 345362966.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MAGNUM COMPANIES
- Site address
- 3536 NICHOLSON AVENUE
- City
- KANSAS CITY
- State
- MO
- ZIP
- 64120
- Mailing
- 3536 NICHOLSON AVENUE, KANSAS CITY, MO 64120
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 484110
- Employees
- 27
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.178 L02 II
- Issued
- Nov 17, 2021
- Abate by
- Dec 14, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $7,802 · Current $5,071 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(2)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training consisting of a combination of formal instruction (e.g., lecture, discussion, interactive computer learning, video tape, written material), practical training (demonstrations performed by the trainer and practical exercises performed by the trainee), and evaluation of the operator's performance in the workplace. Employee's were exposed to struck by hazards from forklifts. Forklift operators were not trained with training consisting of formal instruction, and practical training and evaluation. There was no written and practical evaluation of the forklift operator's driving.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $5071.3
- — Z (S) $7802
1910.178 L06
- Issued
- Nov 17, 2021
- Abate by
- Dec 14, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(6): The certification did not include the name of the operator, the date of the training, the date of the evaluation, and the identity of the person(s) performing the training or evaluation: Employee's were exposed to struck by hazards from forklifts. There was no forklift written operator training certification included the name of the operator, date of training, and identity of the person(s) giving the training or evaluation.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.178 P01
- Issued
- Nov 17, 2021
- Abate by
- Dec 14, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $7,802 · Current $5,071 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(p)(1): Powered industrial truck(s) found to be in need of repair, defective, or in any way unsafe had not been taken out of service until restored to safe operating condition(s): Employees were exposed to struck by hazards. The Toyota Propane forklift BFL 1813 needed repairs as the horn was not working, the backup light was not working, and one of the front lights on the left was not working. The Doosan forklift had not been taken out of service until it was in safe operating condition.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $5071.3
- — Z (S) $7802
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 484110)
More inspections in MO
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345362966.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.