Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ROYAL WHITE CEMENT, INC.

Referral inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of ROYAL WHITE CEMENT, INC. in 8316 EAST FREEWAY, HOUSTON, TX 77029 (NAICS 327320). OSHA activity number 345381586.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Royal White Cement, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Royal White Cement, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
8316 EAST FREEWAY
City
HOUSTON
State
TX
ZIP
77029
Mailing
8316 EAST FREEWAY, HOUSTON, TX 77029
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
327320
Employees
19
Ownership type
A

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.22 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 19 exposed
Issued
Oct 25, 2021
Abate by
Nov 12, 2021
Penalty
Initial $3,121 · Current $1,873 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.22(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that all places of employment, passageways, storerooms, service rooms, and walking-working surfaces are kept in a clean, orderly, and sanitary condition.   On or about June 22, 2021, employees were exposed slip and fall hazards while walking and working in the white  and grey cement areas that were not maintained in a clean condition.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1872.6
  • — Z (S) $3121

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 25, 2021
Abate by
Nov 4, 2021
Penalty
Initial $3,901 · Current $2,341 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.134(c)(1):A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  On or about July 7, 2021, employees were required to wear half face respirators without the employer having established and implemented a respiratory protection program.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2340.6
  • — Z (S) $3901

1910.134 C04

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 25, 2021
Abate by
Nov 4, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(c)(4):The employer did not provide respirators, training, and medical evaluations at no cost to employees:  On or about July 7, 2021, employees are required to wear and purchase their own half face respirators.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 25, 2021
Abate by
Nov 12, 2021
Penalty
Initial $3,901 · Current $2,341 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.134(e)(1):The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  On or about July 7, 2021, employees are required to wear respiratory protection without having been medically evaluated to do so.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2340.6
  • — Z (S) $3901

1910.134 F01

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 25, 2021
Abate by
Nov 12, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(f)(1):The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):  On or about July 7, 2021, employees are required to wear half face respirators without having been fit tested.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 H01

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 25, 2021
Abate by
Oct 29, 2021
Penalty
Initial $3,901 · Current $2,341 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.134(h)(1):Respirators were not cleaned and disinfected using the procedures in Appendix B-2 of 29 CFR 1910.134 or equivalent procedures recommended by the respirator manufacturer:  On or about July 7, 2021, employees were exposed to dermal hazards while wearing tight fitting half face respirators without cleaning and disinfecting the respirators using proper procedures.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2340.6
  • — Z (S) $3901

1910.134 H02 I

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 25, 2021
Abate by
Oct 29, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(h)(2)(i):Respirators were not stored to protect them from damage, contamination, dust, sunlight, extreme temperatures, excessive moisture, and damaging chemicals or  were not packed or stored to prevent deformation of the facepiece and exhalation valve:  On or about July 7, 2021, employees were exposed to respiration hazards while wearing tight fitting half face respirators without storing them so they were protected from damage and deformation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.151 C

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 19 exposed
Issued
Oct 25, 2021
Abate by
Dec 6, 2021
Penalty
Initial $3,901 · Current $2,341 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.151(c):Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use:  On or about July 7, 2021, employees work with caustic cement dust without having suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body provided within the work area for immediate emergency use.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2340.6
  • — Z (S) $3901

1910.1000 A02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 25, 2021
Abate by
Feb 1, 2022
Penalty
Initial $3,901 · Current $2,341 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.1000(a)(2):Employee(s) were exposed to an airborne concentration of respirable dust listed in Table Z-1 in excess of the 8 hour Time Weighted Average concentration:  On or about July 7, 2021, an employee bagging cement in the grey cement area was exposed to respirable dust at a time weighted average of 9.3  mg/m� . This level exceeded the permissible exposure limit (PEL) for respirable dust of 5 mg/m� by 1.87 times. This exposure was derived from samples collected over a 348 minute sampling period.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2340.6
  • — Z (S) $3901

1910.1000 E

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 25, 2021
Abate by
Nov 26, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.1000(e):Feasible administrative or engineering controls were not determined and implemented to achieve compliance with the limits prescribed in 29 CFR 1910.1000(a) through (d):  On or about July 7, 2021, an employee bagging cement in the grey cement area was exposed to respirable dust at a time weighted average of 9.3  mg/m� . This level exceeded the permissible exposure limit (PEL) for respirable dust of 5 mg/m� by 1.87 times. This exposure was derived from samples collected over a 348 minute sampling period. implementing feasible administrative or engineering controls to limit the employee exposure.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View Royal White Cement, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345381586.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.