HITCHCOCK, TX —
OSHA Inspection: JONNY RAMON LOBO BENDECK
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of JONNY RAMON LOBO BENDECK in 6118 WHITE OAK, HITCHCOCK, TX 77563 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 345384911.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- JONNY RAMON LOBO BENDECK
- Site address
- 6118 WHITE OAK
- City
- HITCHCOCK
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 77563
- Mailing
- 14335 ELLA BLVD APT 501, HOUSTON, TX 77014
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Nov 24, 2021
- Abate by
- Dec 9, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $329 · Current $329
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated: a) The employer did not provide abatement certification for Citation 1, Item 1. b) The employer did not provide abatement certification for Citation 1, Item 2. c) The employer did not provide abatement certification for Citation 1, Item 3. d) The employer did not provide abatement certification for Citation 1, Item 4.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $329
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Jul 16, 2021
- Abate by
- Aug 11, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $2,341 · Current $2,341
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees were not protected by protective helmets while working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns: a) At the jobsite, employees were exposed to struck-by hazards while working from window openings and from the ground without using hard hats.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2341
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Jul 16, 2021
- Abate by
- Aug 11, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $2,341 · Current $2,341
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical agents: a) At the jobsite, employees were exposed to struck-by hazards while operating Hitachi NR83A3 nail guns without wearing eye protection. b) At the jobsite, employees were exposed to struck-by hazards while operating Makita 5007F circular saws without wearing eye protection.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2341
1926.451 G01 VII
- Issued
- Jul 16, 2021
- Abate by
- Aug 11, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $2,926 · Current $2,926
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section: a) An employee was exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 24-feet 4-inches when he worked from a pump jack scaffold platform without using fall protection.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2926
1926.452 J02
- Issued
- Jul 16, 2021
- Abate by
- Aug 11, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $2,926 · Current $2,926
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.452(j)(2): Poles were not secured to the structure by rigid triangular bracing or equivalent at the bottom, top, and other points as necessary: a) At the jobsite, an employee was exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 24-feet 4-inches while working from a pump jack scaffold while the poles were not attached at the bottom to the house.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2926
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Jul 16, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $2,926 · Current $2,926
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: a) At the jobsite, employees were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 9-feet 9-inches when they used a Little Giant 13-foot telescoping ladder that was not set three feet above the porch roof landing.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2926
More inspections at Jonny Ramon Lobo Bendeck
View Jonny Ramon Lobo Bendeck's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345384911.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.