Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: RIDGLEY ROOFING AND SIDING, LLC

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of RIDGLEY ROOFING AND SIDING, LLC in 2226 MEADOWWOOD DR., TOLEDO, OH 43606 (NAICS 423330). OSHA activity number 345399257.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Ridgley Roofing and Siding, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Ridgley Roofing and Siding, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
2226 MEADOWWOOD DR.
City
TOLEDO
State
OH
ZIP
43606
Mailing
1314 SUPERIOR ST. GENOA OHIO, GENOA, OH 43430
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
423330
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.20 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Oct 5, 2021
Abate by
Oct 22, 2021
Penalty
Initial $4,096 · Current $4,096
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): The employer did not initiate and maintain such programs as may be necessary to comply with this part.  a)	Ridgley Roofing and Siding on or about July 2, 2021 at the worksite 2226 Meadowwood Dr. Toledo, OH: The employer did not have a plan or program to identify job site hazards, which assists employees in maintaining a safe working environment.  Such programs would support the employer and employees in identifying and avoiding potential hazards, such as falls during job site operations, decreasing the probability of employee injury and/or illness.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4096

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 5, 2021
Abate by
Oct 22, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards.  a)	Ridgley Roofing and Siding on or about July 2, 2021 at the worksite 2226 Meadowwood Dr, Toledo , OH: The employer had not trained employees in the appropriate use of fall protection, such as but not limited to, the use of personal fall arrest systems or alternative measures while performing various roofing operations. The employees did not recognize the hazards associated with working from an elevated location (20') without the benefit of fall protection.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 5, 2021
Abate by
Oct 22, 2021
Penalty
Initial $4,096 · Current $4,096
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels is not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system nor are employees provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b):  a) Ridgley Roofing and Siding on or about July 2, 2021 at the worksite 2226 Meadowwood Dr, Toledo , OH: The employer did not ensure employees were protected from falls while removing and installing shingles on a two story residential structure. The employees were exposed to a fall distance of approximately 20 feet from atop the steep-sloped roof of a residential structure without the benefit of fall protection.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4096

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 5, 2021
Penalty
Initial $2,926 · Current $2,926
29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(1): When portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access; or, when such an extension was not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder was not secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grab rail, was not provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder.  a)	Ridgley Roofing and Siding on or about July 2, 2021 at the worksite 2226 Meadowwood Dr, Toledo , OH: The employer did not ensure the side rails of 30ft. aluminum extension ladders used onsite were extended at least three feet above the landing surface. Three employees were exposed to a near 20' fall to the level below while using the ladder to access the north side of the steep slope roof.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2926

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345399257.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.