Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: REYES LANDSCAPING INC.

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of REYES LANDSCAPING INC. in 1139 MAIN AVE., WARWICK, RI 02886 (NAICS 561730). OSHA activity number 345406391.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Reyes Landscaping INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Reyes Landscaping INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1139 MAIN AVE.
City
WARWICK
State
RI
ZIP
02886
Mailing
485 GREENVILLE AVE., JOHNSTON, RI 02919
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
561730
Employees
10
Ownership type
A

12 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 8 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 20, 2022
Abate by
Feb 23, 2022
Penalty
Initial $349 · Current $349
29 CFR  1903.19(c)(1):The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated:  (a) Establishment:  As of January 20, 2022, the employer had not certified to OSHA that the abatement had been completed for Citation 1, Items 1, 2a, 2b, 3, 4, 5a, and 5b and Citation 3, Item 1 from inspection number 1540639, issued on 11/23/2021, with a final order date of 12/17/2021.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $349

1903.19 D01

Other-than-serious 8 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 20, 2022
Abate by
Feb 23, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1903.19(d)(1):The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required:  (a) Establishment:  As of January 20, 2022, the employer had not provided the required abatement documentation to OSHA for Citation 1, Items 1, 2a, 2b, 3, 4, 5a, and 5b and Citation 3, Item 1 from inspection number 1540639, issued on 11/23/2021, with a final order date of 12/17/2021.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 23, 2021
Abate by
Dec 17, 2021
Penalty
Initial $2,341 · Current $2,341
29 CFR  1926.100(a): Employees were not protected by protective helmets while working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns:  (a) Jobsite: On or about 7/8/2021, the employer did not ensure that employees working in a trench were protected from falling material with a protective helmet.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2341

1926.251 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 23, 2021
Abate by
Dec 17, 2021
Penalty
Initial $2,341 · Current $2,341
29 CFR  1926.251(a)(1):Rigging equipment for material handling was not inspected prior to use on each shift and as necessary during its use to ensure that it was safe:  (a) Jobsite: On or about 7/8/2021, the employer did not ensure that the unknown make and model number alloy steel chain sling was inspected prior to use.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2341

1926.251 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 23, 2021
Abate by
Dec 17, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.251(b)(1): Alloy steel sling(s) did not have permanently affixed durable identification stating size, grade, rated capacity, and manufacturer:  (a) Jobsite: On or about 7/8/2021, the employer did not ensure that the unknown make and model number alloy steel chain sling had an identification tag with a load rating.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.602 A09 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 23, 2021
Abate by
Dec 17, 2021
Penalty
Initial $2,926 · Current $2,926
29 CFR  1926.602(a)(9)(ii): Earth moving or compacting equipment which had an obstructed view to the rear was operated in reverse gear; such equipment did not have in operation a reverse signal alarm distinguishable from the surrounding noise level or did an employee signal that it is safe to do so:   (a) Jobsite: On or about 7/8/2021, the employer did not ensure that the Takeuchi TB260 excavator had a functioning backup alarm.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2926

1926.651 K01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 23, 2021
Abate by
Dec 17, 2021
Penalty
Initial $2,926 · Current $2,926
29 CFR  1926.651(k)(1): An inspection of the excavations, the adjacent areas, and protective systems was not conducted by the competent person prior to the start of work and as needed throughout the shift:   (a) Jobsite: On or about 7/8/2021, the employer did not ensure that the excavation, adjacent areas and trench box were inspected by a competent person prior to the start of work.  (b) Jobsite: On or about 7/13/2021, the employer did not ensure that the excavation, adjacent areas and trench box were inspected by a competent person prior to the start of work.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2926

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 23, 2021
Abate by
Dec 17, 2021
Penalty
Initial $2,341 · Current $2,341
29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(1): Where (a) portable ladder(s) was/were used for access to an upper level landing surface and the ladder's length did not allow the ladder side rails to extend at least 3 feet (0.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed, the ladder was not secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and/or a grasping device was not provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder:   (a) Jobsite: On or about 7/8/2021, the employer did not ensure that employees working in a trench utilized an extension ladder. Employees were utilizing a Husky A Frame ladder to access and egress a trench, and the ladder did not extend at least three feet (3') above the landing surface.  (b) Jobsite: On or about 7/13/2021, the employer did not ensure that employees working in a trench utilized an extension ladder. Employees were utilizing  a Husky A Frame ladder to access and egress a trench, and the ladder did not extend at least three feet (3') above the landing surface.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2341

1926.1053 B04

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 23, 2021
Abate by
Dec 17, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(4): Ladder(s) were used for purposes other than the purpose for which they were designed:   (a) Jobsite: On or about 7/8/2021, the employer did not ensure that employees working in a trench utilized an extension ladder. Employees were utilizing a Husky A Frame ladder to access and egress a trench.  (b) Jobsite: On or about 7/13/2021, the employer did not ensure that employees working in a trench utilized an extension ladder. Employees were utilizing a Husky A Frame ladder to access and egress a trench.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.651 J02

Willful Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 23, 2021
Penalty
Initial $23,405 · Current $23,405
29 CFR  1926.651(j)(2): Protection was not provided by placing and keeping excavated or other materials or equipment at least 2 feet (.61m) from the edge of excavations, or by the use of retaining devices that were sufficient to prevent materials or equipment from falling or rolling into excavations, or by a combination of both if necessary:   (a) Jobsite: On or about 7/8/2021, the employer did not ensure that the excavated material was at least two feet (2') from the edge of the trench. The excavated material was directly against the side of the trench and some of the material had fallen in.  (b) Jobsite: On or about 7/13/2021, the employer did not ensure that the excavated material was at least two feet (2') from the edge of the trench. The excavated material was directly against the side of the trench, and some of the material had fallen in.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (W) $23405

1926.652 A01

Willful Gravity 10 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 23, 2021
Penalty
Initial $27,306 · Current $27,306
29 CFR  1926.652(a)(1): Each employee in an excavation was not protected from cave-ins by an adequate protective system designed in accordance with 29 CFR 1926.652 (b) or (c):   (a) Jobsite: On or about 7/8/2021, the employer did not ensure that employees working in the excavation were protected from cave-in hazards.  (b) Jobsite: On or about  7/13/2021, the employer did not ensure that employees working in the excavation were protected from cave-in hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (W) $27306

1926.652 B03 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 23, 2021
Abate by
Dec 17, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.652(b)(3)(iii): Tabulated data, identifying the registered professional engineer who approved the data, was not maintained at the jobsite during construction of the protective system.  After that time, that data was not made available to the Secretary when requested.     (a) Jobsite: On or about 7/8/2021, the employer did not ensure that the tabulated data for the unknown make and model number trench box was available on site and made available to the Secretary when it was requested.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

View Reyes Landscaping INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345406391.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.