Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: COASTAL WINDOWS AND SIDING, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of COASTAL WINDOWS AND SIDING, INC. in 41-44 DUSTIN HOMESTEAD, ROCHESTER, NH 03839 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 345410344.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Coastal Windows and Siding, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Coastal Windows and Siding, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
41-44 DUSTIN HOMESTEAD
City
ROCHESTER
State
NH
ZIP
03839
Mailing
136 LAFAYETTE RD., NORTH HAMPTON, NH 03862
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
9
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 5 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Nov 5, 2021
Abate by
Dec 10, 2021
Penalty
Initial $329 · Current $329
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation has been abated, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section:  The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation No. 1 Item No(s). 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent October 26, 2021.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $329

1926.20 B01

Serious Gravity 5 6 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2021
Abate by
Oct 6, 2021
Penalty
Initial $2,926 · Current $2,926
29 CFR  1926.20(b)(1):The employer did not initiate and maintain such programs as may be necessary to comply with this part.  Jobsite- The employer did not initiate and maintain an accident prevention program to eliminate eye injury hazards at the jobsite.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2926

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 5 6 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2021
Abate by
Oct 6, 2021
Penalty
Initial $2,926 · Current $2,926
29 CFR  1926.20(b)(2):The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s):  Jobsite - The employer did not perform frequent and regular job site inspections by a competent person to identify hazards associated with fall hazards and eye injuries.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2926

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2021
Abate by
Oct 6, 2021
Penalty
Initial $2,926 · Current $2,926
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles:  Site - Employees were not provided with eye protection while using pneumatic nail guns to install asphalt shingles.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2926

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 6 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2021
Abate by
Oct 6, 2021
Penalty
Initial $2,926 · Current $2,926
29 CFR  1926.503(a)(1):The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  Jobsite - Employees were not trained to recognize the hazards of falling or in the proper procedures to be followed to minimize the hazards where employees were working at elevated locations such as the on the roof were not utilizing fall protection adequately.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2926

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2021
Abate by
Oct 6, 2021
Penalty
Initial $2,926 · Current $2,926
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1):Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:  Site - An aluminum extension ladder used to gain access to and from the roof was not extended at least three feet above the roofs eave.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2926

1926.501 B11

Willful Gravity 10 2 instances 7 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2021
Abate by
Oct 6, 2021
Penalty
Initial $27,306 · Current $27,306
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(11):Each employee on a steep roof with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected from falling by guardrail systems with toeboards, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems:  a. Site (1:17pm) - Employees performing roofing work on a two story condominium complex were not protected from falls of heights between approximately 20 and 26 feet, when fall protection was not utilized.   b. Site (3:46pm) -Employees performing roofing work on a two story condominium complex were still not protected from falls of heights between approximately 20 and 26 feet, when fall protection was still not being utilized, even after being instructed to do so.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (W) $27306

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345410344.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.