Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: NORTH EAST WOODWORKING PRODUCTS INC

Referral inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of NORTH EAST WOODWORKING PRODUCTS INC in 24 OLD MANCHESTER ROAD, RAYMOND, NH 03077 (NAICS 337110). OSHA activity number 345417729.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch North East Woodworking Products INC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for North East Woodworking Products INC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
24 OLD MANCHESTER ROAD
City
RAYMOND
State
NH
ZIP
03077
Mailing
24 OLD MANCHESTER ROAD, RAYMOND, NH 03077
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
337110
Employees
10
Ownership type
A

12 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.106 E07 I C

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 29, 2021
Abate by
Nov 17, 2021
Penalty
Initial $3,901 · Current $1,951 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.106(e)(7)(i)(c):  Locations where flammable vapor-air mixtures may exist under abnormal conditions and for a distance beyond Division 1 locations were not classified Division 2 according to the requirements of subpart S of this part:  location: mixing table On or about June 29, 2021 an electrical outlet in the paint mixing room was not appropriately rated for the area.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1950.5
  • — Z (S) $3901

1910.107 B05 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 29, 2021
Abate by
Nov 17, 2021
Penalty
Initial $2,340 · Current $1,170 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.107(b)(5)(i):There were no visible gauges, audible alarms or pressure activated devices installed in paint spray booths to indicate or ensure that the required air speed was maintained.  Location:  Spray booth  On or about June 29, 2021, the paint booth utilized for daily spray painting activities was not equipped with a visible gauge, audible alarm or pressure activated device to indicate air speed was maintained.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1170
  • — Z (S) $2340

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 29, 2021
Abate by
Nov 17, 2021
Penalty
Initial $3,121 · Current $1,561 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.134(c)(1):A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  Location: painting area and spray booth On or about June 29, 2021, The employer did not have a written respiratory protection program in place where an employee was required to use a half face elastomeric respirator during spray painting activities.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1560.5
  • — Z (S) $3121

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 29, 2021
Abate by
Nov 17, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:   Location: painting area and spray booth On or about June 29, 2021, an employee was required to wear a half faced elastomeric respirator during spray painting activities and had not had a medical evaluation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 29, 2021
Abate by
Nov 17, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):  Location: painting area and spray booth On or about June 29, 2021, an employee performing painting activities was required to wear a half face elastomeric respirator and had not been fit tested.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 G01 I A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 29, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A): Respirators with tight-fitting facepieces were worn by employees who had facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or that interfered with valve function:   Location: painting area and spray booth On or about June 29, 2021, an employee performing painting activities was required to wear a half face elastomeric respirator had a beard that came between his face and the sealing surface of the respirator.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 29, 2021
Abate by
Nov 17, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(h)(1): Respirators were not cleaned and disinfected using the procedures in Appendix B-2 of 29 CFR 1910.134 or equivalent procedures recommended by the respirator manufacturer:   Location: painting area and spray booth On or about June 29, 2021, the respirator used by an employee performing painting activities was not cleaned and disinfected.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 H02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 29, 2021
Abate by
Nov 17, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(h)(2)(i): Respirators were not stored to protect them from damage, contamination, dust, sunlight, extreme temperatures, excessive moisture, and damaging chemicals or  were not packed or stored to prevent deformation of the facepiece and exhalation valve:     Location: painting area and spray booth On or about June 29, 2021, The respirator used in spray painting activities was not stored correctly, and was kept out in the work area exposed to contamination and dust.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 29, 2021
Abate by
Nov 17, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(k): The employer did not provide comprehensive, understandable training which did not occur annually and/or more often if necessary:   Location: painting area and spray booth On or about June 29, 2021, the employer did not provide training on respirator use to an employee who was required to wear a half face elastomeric respirator during spray painting activities.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 29, 2021
Abate by
Nov 17, 2021
Penalty
Initial $3,121 · Current $1,561 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.1200(e)(1):The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  Location: site  On or about June 29, 2021, the employer had not developed a written hazard communication program where employees are working with chemicals such as, but not limited to paint, thinner, primer, filler.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1560.5
  • — Z (S) $3121

1910.1200 G01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 29, 2021
Abate by
Nov 17, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.1200(g)(1):  Employers did not have a safety data sheet in the workplace for each hazardous chemical which they use.   Location: site  On or about June 29, 2021, the employer did not maintain safety data sheet in the workplace for all chemicals that were used such as, but not limited to standard lacquer thinner, care catalyst, and satin varnish.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 29, 2021
Abate by
Nov 17, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:   Location: site  On or about June 29, 2021, employees were not trained on hazardous chemicals used in painting activities such as, but not limited to standard lacquer thinner, care catalyst, and satin varnish.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View North East Woodworking Products INC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345417729.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.