WOODBRIDGE, NJ —
OSHA Inspection: SLEZAK CONSTRUCTION, LLC
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of SLEZAK CONSTRUCTION, LLC in 425 MAIN STREET VERMELLA WOODBRIDGE, WOODBRIDGE, NJ 07095 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 345418339.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SLEZAK CONSTRUCTION, LLC
- Site address
- 425 MAIN STREET VERMELLA WOODBRIDGE
- City
- WOODBRIDGE
- State
- NJ
- ZIP
- 07095
- Mailing
- 30 MAIN AVE., WALLINGTON, NJ 07057
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 7
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Jan 10, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $4,505 · Current $4,505
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): a. 425 Main St., Woodbridge, NJ - Vermella Woodbridge - Building A The employer did not ensure employees were protected from fall hazards. Employees engaged in residential roofing activities on a flat roof were not protected from falls by use of guardrails systems, personal fall arrest systems, a safety net system, or use of warning line and monitor. Violation observed on or about July 14, 2021
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4505
1926.502 F01
- Issued
- Jan 10, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $4,505 · Current $4,505
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(f)(1):Warning lines were not erected around all sides of the roof work area: a. 425 Main St., Woodbridge, NJ - Vermella Woodbridge - Building A The employer did not ensure warning line systems were erected around all sides of the roof work area. Employees engaged in residential roofing activities work from the roof with missing or incorrectly installed warning lines. Violation observed on or about July 14, 2021
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4505
1926.502 F01 I
- Issued
- Jan 10, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(f)(1)(i): When no mechanical equipment was being used the warning line was not erected at least 6 feet (1.8m) from the roof edge: a. 425 Main St., Woodbridge, NJ - Vermella Woodbridge - Building A The employer did not ensure warning line systems were erected at least 6 feet from the edge around all sides of the roof work area. Employees engaged in residential roofing activities worked from the roof with missing, sagging, or incorrectly installed warning lines that were not at least 6-foot from the edge. Violation observed on or about July 14, 2021
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.502 F02
- Issued
- Jan 10, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(f)(2): Warning line systems did not consist of ropes, wires, or chains, and supporting stanchions erected in accordance with (f)(2)(i) through (f)(2)(v) of this section: a. 425 Main St., Woodbridge, NJ - Vermella Woodbridge - Building A The employer did not ensure warning line systems were erected with supporting stanchions around the entire work area. Employees engaged in residential roofing activities worked from the roof with sagging and/or unsupported warning lines that were not supported with stanchions to prevent warning lines from sagging. Violation observed on or about July 14, 2021
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.502 F02 II
- Issued
- Jan 10, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(f)(2)(ii): The rope, wire, or chain was not rigged or supported in such a way that its lowest point (including sag) was not less than 34 inches (0.9 m) from the walking/working surface and its highest point no more than 39 inches (1.0 m) from the walking/working surface: a. 425 Main St., Woodbridge, NJ - Vermella Woodbridge - Building A The employer did not ensure warning line systems were erected and supported in a manner that the lowest point was not less than 34 inches around all sides of the roof work area. Employees engaged in residential roofing activities worked from the roof with sagging and/or unsupported warning lines that were not less than 34 inches from the roof deck. Violation observed on or about July 14, 2021
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at Slezak Construction, LLC
View Slezak Construction, LLC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in NJ
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345418339.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.