Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ROETMAN'S WELDING LLC

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of ROETMAN'S WELDING LLC in 155 BEAVER STREET, AKRON, OH 44304 (NAICS 811490). OSHA activity number 345420640.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Roetman'S Welding LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Roetman'S Welding LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
155 BEAVER STREET
City
AKRON
State
OH
ZIP
44304
Mailing
155 BEAVER STREET, AKRON, OH 44304
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
811490
Employees
8
Ownership type
A

18 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.95 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Dec 8, 2021
Abate by
Dec 28, 2021
Penalty
Initial $2,926 · Current $1,024 Reduced

Hazardous substances 8111

29 CFR  1910.95(c)(1):The employer did not administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program as described in 29 CFR 1910.9(c) through (o) whenever employee noise exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 decibels measured on the A scale, or equivalently a dose of fifty percent:  a.	On September 16, 2021 an employee performing welding operations was exposed to noise at 71.1% of the permissible daily dose, or an average sound level of 87.6 dBA as measured over 475 minutes of sampling.  This dose is equivalent to an 8-hour TWA exposure of 87.5 dBA accounting for the period of 5 minutes unmonitored.  b.	On September 16, 2021 an employee operating the shear and press brake was exposed to noise at 71.4% of the permissible daily dose, or an average sound level of 87.8 dBA as measured over 462 minutes of sampling.  This dose is equivalent to an 8-hour TWA exposure of 87.5 dBA accounting for the period of 18 minutes unmonitored.  The employer did not develop and implement a hearing conservation program.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1024
  • — Z (S) $2926

1910.107 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 8, 2021
Abate by
Dec 28, 2021
Penalty
Initial $3,511 · Current $1,229 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.107(b)(1):The spraybooth�was not�substantially constructed�of steel,�securely and�rigidly supported,�or of�concrete or�masonry.  On or about July 15, 2021, employees were required to spray combustible paints and primers including, but not limited to Safety Red Aqua Maintenance Enamel, United Aqua Brown Aqua Enamel, and Gray Aqua Primer while inside of a spray booth constructed of wood framing and plywood.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1229
  • — Z (S) $3511

1910.107 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 8, 2021
Abate by
Dec 28, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.107(b)(2):The interior surfaces of spray booths were not smooth and continuous without edges and otherwise designed to prevent pocketing of residues and facilitate cleaning and washing without injury.  On or about July 15, 2021, the construction of the facility's spray booth was not smooth and continuous without edges. It allowed for the pocketing of residues at joints where framing and plywood meet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.107 G02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 8, 2021
Abate by
Dec 28, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.107(g)(2):All spraying areas were not kept as free from the accumulation of deposits of combustible residues as practical, with cleaning conducted daily if necessary:  On or about July 15, 2021, the employer did not ensure that the paintbooth was kept free from the accumulation of deposits of combustible residues generated by the spraying of paints and primers including, but not limited to Safety Red Aqua Maintenance Enamel, United Aqua Brown Aqua Enamel, and Gray Aqua Primer.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.107 B10

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 8, 2021
Abate by
Dec 28, 2021
Penalty
Initial $3,511 · Current $1,229 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.107(b)(10):29 CFR 1910.107(b)(10):  Illumination panels did not effectively isolate the spraying area from the area in which the lighting unit is located.  On or about July 15, 2021, lighting in the facility's spray booth was located entirely in the booth and was covered with paint residue, painter's tape, and plastic sheeting.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1229
  • — Z (S) $3511

1910.107 C05

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 8, 2021
Abate by
Dec 28, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.107(c)(5):29 CFR 1910.107(c)(5):  Electrical equipment not approved for locations containing both deposits of readily ignitable residues and explosive vapors was present in spraying area(s):  On or about July 15, 2021, paint overspray was observed to accumulate on standard light switches, wiring, and other electrical equipment including, but not limited to fans.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.107 D02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 8, 2021
Abate by
Dec 28, 2021
Penalty
Initial $3,511 · Current $1,229 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.107(d)(2):Spraying areas were not provided with adequate mechanical ventilation to remove flammable vapors, mists, or powders to a safe location and to confine and control combustible residues so that life was not endangered. Mechanical ventilation was not kept in operation at all times while spraying operations were being conducted and for a sufficient time thereafter to allow vapors from drying coated articles and drying finishing material residue to be exhausted.  On or about July 15, 2021, the employer did not ensure that a spray area utilized on a daily basis included mechanical ventilation to remove flammable vapors, mists, or powders and to confine and control combustible residues.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1229
  • — Z (S) $3511

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 8, 2021
Penalty
Initial $1,755 · Current $614 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.134(c)(1):A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  On or about July 15, 2021, where employees were required to wear a half mask air purifying respirator while spraying paint, the employer had not developed and implemented a written respiratory protection program.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $614
  • — Z (S) $1755

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 8, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(e)(1):The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  On or about July 15, 2021, the employer did not ensure that medical evaluations were provided to employees required to wear a half mask air purifying respirator while spraying paint.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 8, 2021
Abate by
Dec 28, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(f)(2):Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator:  On or about July 15, 2021, the employer did not ensure fit testing was conducted for each employee required to wear a half mask air purifying respirator while spraying paint.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 8, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(k)(1):The employer did not provide respirator training that would ensure each employee could demonstrate knowledge of items in section (i)-(vii):  On or about July 15, 2021, the employer did not ensure that respiratory protection training was provided for each employee required to wear a half mask air purifying respirator while spraying paint.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 L01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Dec 8, 2021
Penalty
Initial $3,511 · Current $1,229 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.178(l)(1)(i):The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l):  On or about July 15, 2021, the employer did not ensure that employees who utilize a forklift to move materials and fabricated dumpsters were trained and evaluated prior to being permitted to operate the forklift.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1229
  • — Z (S) $3511

1910.212 A03 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 8, 2021
Abate by
Dec 28, 2021
Penalty
Initial $4,096 · Current $1,448 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.212(a)(3)(ii):Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s):  On or about July 15, 2021, the employer did not ensure that guarding was in place for the point of operation on Cincinnati 9 Series X Press Brake (sn39799).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1448
  • — Z (S) $4096

1910.253 B04 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Dec 8, 2021
Abate by
Dec 28, 2021
Penalty
Initial $2,341 · Current $819 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.253(b)(4)(iii): Oxygen cylinders in storage were not separated from fuel-gas cylinders or combustible materials (especially oil or grease), a minimum distance of 20 feet (6.1 m) or by a noncombustible barrier at least 5 feet (1.5 m) high having a fire-resistance rating of at least one-half hour.  On or about July 15, 2021, the employer did not ensure that oxygen cylinders were stored away from fuel-gas cylinders including but not limited to propane and acetylene.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $819
  • — Z (S) $2341

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Dec 8, 2021
Penalty
Initial $2,341 · Current $819 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.1200(e)(1):The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  On or about July 15, 2021, where employees work with and around chemicals including but not limited to paints, primers, propane, acetylene, and oxygen, the employer had not developed and implemented a written hazard communication program.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $819
  • — Z (S) $2341

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Dec 8, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.1200(h)(1):Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  On or about July 15, 2021, the employer did not ensure that hazard communication training had been provided to employees that work with and around chemicals including but not limited to paints, primers, propane, acetylene, and oxygen.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.132 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Dec 8, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE):   On or about July 15, 2021, where employees work with and around chemicals and hazards including, but not limited to paints, primers, noise, and weld fumes, the employer had not ensured that a hazard assessment had been conducted, documented, and certified.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.107 G07

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 8, 2021
Abate by
Dec 28, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.107(g)(7): "No smoking" signs in large letters on contrasting color backgrounds were not conspicuously posted at all spraying areas and the paint storage rooms:   On or about July 15 2021, the employer did not ensure that signage indicating "no smoking" was posted at the paint booth.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Roetman'S Welding LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345420640.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.