Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: GREAT LAKES MECHANICAL, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of GREAT LAKES MECHANICAL, INC. in 802 BROADWAY STREET SOUTH, MENOMONIE, WI 54751 (NAICS 238220). OSHA activity number 345424824.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Great Lakes Mechanical, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Great Lakes Mechanical, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
802 BROADWAY STREET SOUTH
City
MENOMONIE
State
WI
ZIP
54751
Mailing
N962 TOWER VIEW DRIVE, GREENVILLE, WI 54942
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
A
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238220
Employees
7
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.651 J02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 8, 2021
Abate by
Sep 16, 2021
Penalty
Initial $5,461 · Current $3,823 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.651(j)(2): Protection was not provided by placing and keeping excavated or other materials or equipment at least 2 feet (.61m) from the edge of excavations, or by the use of retaining devices that were sufficient to prevent materials or equipment from falling or rolling into excavations, or by a combination of both if necessary:  (a) At the excavation near pit # 24: The spoil pile of excavated materials was not set back at least 2 feet away from the excavation edge along the south side.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3822.7
  • — Z (S) $5461

1926.652 B01 I

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Sep 8, 2021
Abate by
Sep 17, 2021
Penalty
Initial $9,557 · Current $6,690 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.652(b)(1)(i): Excavations were sloped at a steeper angle than one-half horizontal to one vertical (34 degrees):  (a) In the excavation near pit #24 on the north side: Cave in protection was not adequate as the slope angle of the excavation wall measured at approximately 50 degrees.  (b) In the excavation near pit #27 on the east side: Cave in protection was not adequate as the slope angle of the excavation wall measured at approximately 47 degrees.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $6689.9
  • — Z (S) $9557

1926.701 B

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 8, 2021
Abate by
Sep 20, 2021
Penalty
Initial $8,192 · Current $5,734 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.701(b): All protruding reinforcing steel, onto and/or into which employees could fall, was not guarded to eliminate the hazard of impalement:  (a) At the open pit along west side of excavation: The top wall of the concrete pit had protruding reinforcing steel that was not guarded.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $5734.4
  • — Z (S) $8192

1926.1053 B04

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 8, 2021
Penalty
Initial $8,192 · Current $5,734 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(4): Ladders were used for purposes other than the purposes for which they were designed:  (a) At open pit along west side of excavation: The 8 foot Louisville folding step ladder that was used to enter the pit was used in the folded position rather than in the open position. The ladder was leaning against the top edge of the concrete wall at the midpoint of the ladder creating a tipping  potential.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $5734.4
  • — Z (S) $8192

1926.1203 A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 8, 2021
Abate by
Sep 16, 2021
Penalty
Initial $9,557 · Current $6,690 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.1203(a): Before it begins work at a worksite, the employer did not ensure that a competent person identified all confined spaces in which one or more of the employees it directs may work, and identify each space that is a permit space, through consideration and evaluation of the elements of that space, including testing as necessary:  (a) At pit #27: The employer failed to have a competent person identify the pit as a permit required confined space for performing welding operations inside of the pit.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $6689.9
  • — Z (S) $9557

1926.1204 E01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 8, 2021
Abate by
Sep 16, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.1204(e)(1): 29 CFR 1926.1204(e)(1): Permit confined space was not tested to determine if acceptable entry conditions existed before authorized entry was begun:  (a) At pit #27: The employer failed to perform atmospheric testing prior to entry into the confined space to perform welding operations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1204 E02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 8, 2021
Abate by
Sep 16, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.1204(e)(2): Atmospheric hazards were not continuously monitored and the employer did not demonstrate that the equipment  for continuously monitoring was not commercially available and periodic monitoring was not used during the course of entry operations:  (a) At pit #27: The employer failed to perform continuous atmospheric monitoring during welding operations in a confined space.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1205 A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 8, 2021
Abate by
Sep 16, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1205(a): Before entry was authorized, the employer did not document the completion of measures required by paragraph 1926.1204(c) of this standard by preparing an entry permit:  (a) At pit #27: The employer failed to prepare a permit prior to entry into the confined space to perform welding operations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View Great Lakes Mechanical, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345424824.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.