Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: KINGS WARRIORS CONSTRUCTION LLC

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of KINGS WARRIORS CONSTRUCTION LLC in 3370 NOREEN DRIVE, COLUMBUS, OH 43221 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 345429591.

Watch Kings Warriors Construction LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Kings Warriors Construction LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
3370 NOREEN DRIVE
City
COLUMBUS
State
OH
ZIP
43221
Mailing
335 DELL STREET, DAYTON, OH 45404
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.20 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2926.00 · Current $2926.00
29 CFR  1926.20(b)(1): It shall be the responsibility of the employer to initiate and maintain such programs as may be necessary to comply with this part.  a. On or about July 21, 2021, and at times prior, the employer did not initiate and maintain safety and health programs and enforcement of programs to protect employees during roofing activities. As a result, employees were exposed to fall hazards when working from ladders and from the roof to perform roofing activities.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2926

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2926.00 · Current $2926.00
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502.  a. On or about July 21, 2021, employees were working to tear off roofing shingles of an existing residential structure at above 6 feet with no fall protection measures in use. As a result, employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 9 to 18 feet.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2926

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2926.00 · Current $2926.00
29 CFR  1926.503(a)(1): The employer shall provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards. The program shall enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and shall train each employee in the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards.  a. On or about July 21, 2021, and at times prior, employees performing roofing work were not trained on procedures of how to minimize fall hazards. As a result, employees were exposed to fall hazards of 9 to 15 feet or more.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2926

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2926.00 · Current $2926.00
29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(1): When portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails shall extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access; or, when such an extension is not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder shall be secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, shall be provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. In no case shall the extension be such that ladder deflection under a load would, by itself, cause the ladder to slip off its support.  a. On or about July 21, 2021, employees were utilizing a portable extension ladder to access both portions of the roof that did not extend at least 3 feet above the surface they were accessing. As a result, employees were exposed to fall hazards of 9 feet - 6 inches and more.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2926

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345429591.