KINGSTON, NH —
OSHA Inspection: DAWN MELANSON
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of DAWN MELANSON in 5 NEWTON JUNCTION RD, KINGSTON, NH 03848 (NAICS 236118). OSHA activity number 345432884.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- DAWN MELANSON
- Site address
- 5 NEWTON JUNCTION RD
- City
- KINGSTON
- State
- NH
- ZIP
- 03848
- Mailing
- 85 EXETER ROAD, SOUTH HAMPTON, NH 03827
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 236118
- Employees
- 1
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Nov 5, 2021
- Abate by
- Dec 10, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $361 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation has been abated, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section: The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation No. 1 Item No(s). 1, 2, 3, and 2-1 nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent October 18, 2021.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $0
- — C (O) $361
- — Z (O) $361
1926.20 B01
- Issued
- Sep 10, 2021
- Abate by
- Sep 29, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $3,218 · Current $644 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): The employer did not initiate and maintain accident prevention programs as necessary to comply with this part: Site- An employee and workers under the control of the employer were not protected from fall and struck by hazards where the employer did not initiate and maintain an accident prevention program.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $643.6
- — C (S) $3218
- — Z (S) $3218
1926.21 B02
- Issued
- Sep 10, 2021
- Abate by
- Sep 29, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $3,218 · Current $644 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his/her environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury: Site- An employee exposed to an overhead struck by hazard while working from the ground was not provided with personal protective equipment training from the employer.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $643.6
- — C (S) $3218
- — Z (S) $3218
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Sep 10, 2021
- Abate by
- Sep 16, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $3,218 · Current $644 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a):Employees were not protected by protective helmets while working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns: Site- An employee working from the ground was not protected from an overhead struck by hazard where head protection was not worn.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $643.6
- — C (S) $3218
- — Z (S) $3218
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Sep 10, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $4,505 · Current $902 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): Site- Workers under the control of the employer, working from the roof, were exposed to falls between 10 and 20 feet where fall protection was not utilized.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $901.5
- — C (S) $4505
- — Z (S) $4505
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- Sep 10, 2021
- Abate by
- Sep 29, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $6,437 · Current $1,287 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s) Site- An employee and workers under the control of the employer were not protected from fall and struck by hazards where the employer did not have frequent and regular inspections of the jobsite conducted by a competent person. Dawn Melanson dba Dawn Melanson Construction was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard, which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1158895, citation number 1, item number 1, and was affirmed as a final order on November 1, 2016, with respect to a workplace located at 10 Sevoian Drive, Methuen, MA 01844.
Recent events (3)
- — F (R) $1287.4
- — C (R) $6437
- — Z (R) $6437
More inspections at Dawn Melanson
View Dawn Melanson's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 236118)
More inspections in NH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345432884.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.