KINGSTON, NH —
OSHA Inspection: ZHUMI CONSTRUCTION INC
Unprogrammed Related inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Related safety inspection of ZHUMI CONSTRUCTION INC in 5 NEWTON JUNCTION RD, KINGSTON, NH 03848 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 345432975.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ZHUMI CONSTRUCTION INC
- Site address
- 5 NEWTON JUNCTION RD
- City
- KINGSTON
- State
- NH
- ZIP
- 03848
- Mailing
- 15 LAWRENCE STREET #2, MILFORD, MA 01757
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Unprogrammed Related (G)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
9 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.20 B01
- Issued
- Sep 9, 2021
- Abate by
- Sep 15, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $3,218 · Current $2,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): The employer did not initiate and maintain accident prevention programs as necessary to comply with this part: Site- Employees were not protected from fall and struck by hazards where the employer did not initiate and maintain an accident prevention program.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2000
- — Z (S) $3218
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- Sep 9, 2021
- Abate by
- Sep 15, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $3,218 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2):The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s): Site- Employees were not protected from fall and struck by hazards where the employer did not have a competent person conduct frequent and regular inspections of the job site.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $3218
1926.21 B02
- Issued
- Sep 9, 2021
- Abate by
- Sep 28, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $3,218 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his/her environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury: Site- Employees exposed to eye injuries while operating pneumatic nail guns were not provided with personal protective equipment training from the employer.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $3218
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Sep 9, 2021
- Abate by
- Sep 15, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $3,218 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees were not protected by protective helmets while working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns: Site- An employee working from the ground was not protected from a head injury where the employer did not require the wearing of head protection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $3218
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Sep 9, 2021
- Abate by
- Sep 15, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $3,218 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): 29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical agents: Site- Employees operating pneumatic nail guns were not protected from eye injuries where eye protection was not worn.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $3218
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Sep 9, 2021
- Abate by
- Sep 28, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $3,218 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: Site- Employees working from the roof without fall protection were not provided with fall protection from the employer.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $3218
1926.1051 A
- Issued
- Sep 9, 2021
- Abate by
- Sep 15, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $3,218 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1051(a): Stairway(s) or ladder(s) were not provided at all personnel points of access where there was a break in elevation of 19 inches (48 cm) or more, or no ramp, runway, sloped embankment, or personnel hoist was provided: Site- Employees were not protected from a fall hazard where employees were using a RGC material hoist to access the roof where a ladder was not provided.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $3218
1926.1060 A
- Issued
- Sep 9, 2021
- Abate by
- Sep 28, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $3,218 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways and train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards. Site- Employees exposed to a fall hazard while using a RGC material hoist to access the roof were not provided with ladder training from the employer.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $3218
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Sep 9, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $9,011 · Current $5,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): Site- Employees working from the roof were not protected from a fall between 10 and 20 feet where fall protection was not utilized. Zhumi Construction Inc was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard, which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1488501, citation number 1, item number 1 and was affirmed as a final order on April 22, 2021, with respect to a workplace located at 112 East Main Street, Merrimac, MA 01860.
Recent events (2)
- — I (R) $5000
- — Z (R) $9011
More inspections at Zhumi Construction INC
View Zhumi Construction INC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in NH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345432975.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.