Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: SERGIO MELO CARAZA

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of SERGIO MELO CARAZA in LOT NO. 45 KEANAN LANE, ALTOONA, WI 54720 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 345436562.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Sergio Melo Caraza — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Sergio Melo Caraza is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
SERGIO MELO CARAZA
Site address
LOT NO. 45 KEANAN LANE
City
ALTOONA
State
WI
ZIP
54720
Mailing
386 MARIE AVE E APT 207D, WEST SAINT PAUL, MN 55118
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
2
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 29, 2021
Abate by
Oct 14, 2021
Penalty
Initial $2,341 · Current $2,341
29 CFR  1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s):  (a) Throughout the site; The employer did not conduct frequent and regular inspections of the job site to identify and correct hazards associated with falls, portable ladder use and housekeeping.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2341

1926.25 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 29, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.25(a): During the course of construction, alteration, or repairs,  debris was not kept cleared from work areas, passageways, and stairs, in and around buildings or other structures:  (a) Southeast side of residential structure; At ground level, construction materials and debris associated with roofing work was not kept clear from work area(s), including the area surrounding the base of an aluminum extension ladder used by workers to access and egress the roof.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 29, 2021
Abate by
Oct 14, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):  (a) Residential structure rooftop; One or more methods of fall protection was not in place while workers performed roofing work from a 5:12 pitch roof at heights greater than 8.5 feet above ground level.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 29, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:  (a) Southeast side of residential structure; The side rails of a 20-foot aluminum extension ladder used by workers for roof access and egress did not extend at least 3 feet above the upper landing surface.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.95 D06

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 29, 2021
Abate by
Oct 14, 2021
Penalty
Initial $2,341 · Current $2,341
29 CFR  1926.95(d)(6): The employer required employees to provide or pay for his or her own PPE that was not excepted by paragraphs (d)(2) through (d)(5) of this section:  (a) Residential structure rooftop, various locations; The employer required workers(s) to provide and pay for their own personal fall protection equipment, including full body harnesses, 50-foot synthetic rope lifelines and temporary anchorage connection points.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2341

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 29, 2021
Abate by
Oct 14, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  (a) Residential structure rooftop;  Workers exposed to fall hazards during roofing operations did not receive fall hazard awareness or fall prevention training.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

View Sergio Melo Caraza's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345436562.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.