Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: HERNANDEZ STUCCO AND TILE

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of HERNANDEZ STUCCO AND TILE in 6702 SOUTH STAPLES, CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78413 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 345439939.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Hernandez Stucco and Tile — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Hernandez Stucco and Tile is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
6702 SOUTH STAPLES
City
CORPUS CHRISTI
State
TX
ZIP
78413
Mailing
1721 SEA OAK, CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78413
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 14, 2021
Penalty
Initial $2,926 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.100(a): Employees were not protected by protective helmets while working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns.    On or about July 22, 2021 at this workplace, employees conducted exterior wall stucco applications, worked from scaffolding and on the ground without protective helmets to protect from head injuries by falling objects and materials.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2926

1926.451 E01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 14, 2021
Penalty
Initial $2,926 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.451(e)(1):When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used.  Crossbraces were used as a means of access.  On or about July 22, 2021 at this workplace, employees conducted exterior wall stucco applications, worked from scaffolding heights of  greater than  10 feet above a lower level without a means of access to enter or exit the scaffolding system.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2926

1926.451 G04 I

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 14, 2021
Penalty
Initial $2,926 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.451(g)(4)(i): Guardrail systems were not installed along all open sides and ends of platforms.   On or about July 22, 2021 at this workplace, employees conducted exterior wall stucco applications, worked from scaffolding heights of  greater than  10 feet above a lower level without a guard railing system installed along all open sides of the platform.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2926

1926.451 H02 II

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 14, 2021
Penalty
Initial $2,926 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.451(h)(2)(ii): A toeboard was not erected along the edge of platforms more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower levels for a distance sufficient to protect employees below:Note:  This requirement does not apply to float (ship) scaffolds where an edging of 3/4 inch x 1 1/2 inch (2 x 4 cm) wood or equivalent was used in lieu of toeboards.   On or about July 22, 2021 at this workplace, employees conducted exterior wall stucco applications, worked from scaffolding heights of  greater than  10 feet above a lower level without toe boards to protect employees below from falling objects.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2926

1926.454 B

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 14, 2021
Penalty
Initial $2,926 · Current $1,463 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.454(b): The employer did not have each employee who was involved in erecting, disassembling, moving, operating, repairing, maintaining, or inspecting a scaffold trained by a competent person to recognize any hazards associated with the work.    On or about July 22, 2021 at this workplace, employees conducted exterior wall stucco applications, worked from scaffolding heights of  greater than  10 feet above a lower level and the scaffolding was not erected by a competent person.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1463
  • — Z (S) $2926

1926.1053 B04

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 14, 2021
Penalty
Initial $2,926 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(4): Ladders were not used for the purpose for which they were designed.  On or about July 22, 2021 at this workplace, employees conducted exterior wall stucco applications, worked less than six feet above the ground from platform planking supported between step ladder rungs.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2926

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345439939.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.