TULSA, OK —
OSHA Inspection: B T MACHINE, INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of B T MACHINE, INC. in 16210 MARSHALL STREET, TULSA, OK 74116 (NAICS 332710). OSHA activity number 345451934.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- B T MACHINE, INC.
- Site address
- 16210 MARSHALL STREET
- City
- TULSA
- State
- OK
- ZIP
- 74116
- Mailing
- 16210 MARSHALL STREET, TULSA, OK 74116
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332710
- Employees
- 22
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
9 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.107 H12
- Issued
- Jan 12, 2022
- Abate by
- Oct 3, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $2,653 · Current $1,300 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.107(h)(12): Electrostatic spray area(s) were not provided with automatic sprinkler protection or other approved automatic extinguishing equipment. On or about July 28, 2021, and at times prior thereto, at the powder coating booth, the employer did not install automatic sprinklers, or other approved automatic extinguishing equipment, to the interior areas of each powder spray booth. This exposed employees to fires.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1300
- — Z (S) $2653
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Jan 12, 2022
- Abate by
- Mar 2, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $2,653 · Current $1,300 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace. On or July 29, 2021, and at time prior thereto, at the facility, the employer did not provide a medical evaluation for an employee that was in use of a respirator. This exposed the employee to health hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1300
- — Z (S) $2653
1910.134 G01 I A
- Issued
- Jan 12, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A): Respirators with tight-fitting facepieces were worn by employees who had facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or that interfered with valve function. On or July 28, 2021, and at time prior thereto, at the powder coating area, the employer did not ensure an employee, who is required to wear a tight-fitting respirator, did not have facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face. This exposed the employee chemical hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 I05 IV
- Issued
- Jan 12, 2022
- Abate by
- Mar 2, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(i)(5)(iv): The employer did not ensure that the person authorized to perform the necessary sorbent bed and filter changes filled out a tag indicating by the signature and date that maintenance changes were performed. On or about July 29, 2021, and at times prior thereto, at the blasting areas, the employer did not ensure that the person authorized to perform the necessary sorbent bed and filter changes completed a tag and posted it at the sorbent bed or at the compressor. This exposed employees to the health hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Jan 12, 2022
- Abate by
- Mar 2, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $2,653 · Current $1,300 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. On or about July 28, 2021, and at times prior thereto, in the CNC machine shop, the employer did not ensure the CNC lathe and mill machines had operable interlock devices installed on the doors. This exposed the employees to caught in hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1300
- — Z (S) $2653
1910.215 A04
- Issued
- Jan 12, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $1,989 · Current $900 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(4): Work rest(s) on grinding machinery were not adjusted closely to the wheel with a maximum opening of one eighth inch. On or about July 28, 2021, and at times prior thereto, in the CNC machine shop, the employer did not ensure that the opening between the work rest and the wheel of an abrasive wheel grinding machine was not greater than one-eighth inch. This exposed the employees to a struck-by and caught-in hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $900
- — Z (S) $1989
1910.215 B09
- Issued
- Jan 12, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9): Guard for abrasive wheel machine where the operator stands in front of the machine was not constructed so that the peripheral protecting member could be adjusted to the constantly decreasing diameter of the wheel. On or about July 28, 2021, and at times prior thereto, in the CNC machine shop, the employer did not ensure the tongue guard was installed on an abrasive wheel grinding machine. This exposed the employees to a struck-by and caught-in hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.215 D01
- Issued
- Jan 12, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.215(d)(1): Wheel(s) on grinding machine(s) were not sounded (ring test) and inspected for damage before mounting. On or about July 28, 2021, and at times prior thereto, in the CNC machine shop area, the employer did not ensure the wheel on a grinding machine was sounded (ring tested). This exposed the employees struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.147 C04 I
- Issued
- Jan 12, 2022
- Abate by
- Mar 2, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $372 · Current $200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section. On or about July 28, 2021, and at times prior thereto, at the establishment the employer did not develop and document step-by-step lock-out/tag-out procedures for the control of potentially hazardous energy of specific equipment when employees are required to perform Lock-out/Tag-out of equipment. This exposed the employees to the hazards of an unexpected release of energy.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $200
- — Z (O) $372
More inspections at B T Machine, INC.
View B T Machine, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332710)
More inspections in OK
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345451934.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.