BATON ROUGE, LA —
OSHA Inspection: ST. JAMES PLACE OF BATON ROUGE
Referral inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of ST. JAMES PLACE OF BATON ROUGE in 333 LEE DR., BATON ROUGE, LA 70808 (NAICS 623311). OSHA activity number 345471049.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ST. JAMES PLACE OF BATON ROUGE
- Site address
- 333 LEE DR.
- City
- BATON ROUGE
- State
- LA
- ZIP
- 70808
- Mailing
- 333 LEE DR., BATON ROUGE, LA 70808
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 623311
- Employees
- 330
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Oct 29, 2021
- Abate by
- Dec 17, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $9,753 · Current $5,852 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: a) Resident rooms: On or about August 12, 2021, employees provided healthcare for residents with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 without the benefit of a respiratory protection program.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $5851.8
- — Z (S) $9753
1910.134 D01 II
- Issued
- Oct 29, 2021
- Abate by
- Dec 17, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(ii): The employer did not select and use a NIOSH-certified respirator in compliance with the conditions of its certification: a) Resident rooms: On or about August 12, 2021, employees that provided healthcare for residents with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 were allowed to use respirators that were not NIOSH-certified in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.134.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Oct 29, 2021
- Abate by
- Dec 17, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: a) Resident rooms: On or about August 12, 2021, employees that provided healthcare for residents with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 were not provided a medical evaluation prior to required use of respirators.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- Oct 29, 2021
- Abate by
- Dec 17, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator: a) Resident rooms: On or about August 12, 2021, employees that provided healthcare for residents with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 were not fit tested prior to required use of respirators.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1904.4 A
- Issued
- Oct 29, 2021
- Abate by
- Dec 17, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.4(a): The employer did not record each work-related fatality, injury or illness case that resulted in the general recording criteria on the OSHA Form 300 or equivalent: Facility: On or about August 12, 2021, the employer did not record the following workplace injuries and illnesses on the OSHA Form 300 or equivalent for the calendar year 2021. a) July 27, 2021, Assisted Living, illness following exposure to SARS-CoV-2 that resulted in days away was not recorded. b) August 2, 2021, Assisted Living, illness following exposure to SARS-CoV-2 that resulted in days away was not recorded. c) August 3, 2021, Companion Services, illness following exposure to SARS-CoV-2 that resulted in days away was not recorded. d) August 3, 2021, Assisted Living, illness following exposure to SARS-CoV-2 that resulted in days away was not recorded. e) August 7, 2021, Companion Services, illness following exposure to SARS-CoV-2 that resulted in days away was not recorded. f) August 17 2021, Certified Nursing Assistant, illness following exposure to SARS-CoV-2 that resulted in days away was not recorded.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.502 L05 III B
- Issued
- Oct 29, 2021
- Abate by
- Dec 17, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.502(l)(5)(iii)(B): For employers with fewer than 500 employees, the employer did not pay the employee up to the $1,400 per week cap or the reduced amounts in accordance with the requirements of this section: a) Facility: On or about August 12, 2021, employees removed from work until they met the return to work criteria in paragraph (l)(6) of this section were not paid in accordance with the requirements of this section had the employee not been absent from work.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at ST. James Place of Baton Rouge
View ST. James Place of Baton Rouge's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 623311)
More inspections in LA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345471049.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.