Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: DAIKIN AMERICA, INC.

Federal Agency inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a federal Agency safety inspection of DAIKIN AMERICA, INC. in 905 STATE DOCKS ROAD, DECATUR, AL 35601 (NAICS 325211). OSHA activity number 345474142.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Daikin America, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Daikin America, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
905 STATE DOCKS ROAD
City
DECATUR
State
AL
ZIP
35601
Mailing
P.O. BOX 2252, DECATUR, AL 35609
Inspection type
Federal Agency (M)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
325211
Employees
408
Ownership type
A

10 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Dec 30, 2021
Abate by
Mar 28, 2022
Penalty
Initial $13,653 · Current $10,835 Reduced

Hazardous substances P345

Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employee(s) that were exposed to respiratory hazards.  On or about July 2-3, 2021, at the M1/M2 Process Area, night shift employees were exposed to a respiratory hazard, where all necessary information concerning potentially hazardous substances in connection with T-250 was not provided.  Among other methods, feasible means of abatement consist of providing necessary information as an attachment to the employer?s existing Safe Work Permit issued at the time the work commenced.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $10835
  • — C (S) $13653
  • — Z (S) $13653

1910.1200 G01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Dec 30, 2021
Abate by
Mar 28, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances P345

29 CFR  1910.1200(g)(1):  Chemical manufacturers and importers did not obtain or develop a safety data sheet for each hazardous chemical and for each chemical that posed a hazard not otherwise classified that they produce or import:   (a) On or about 07/02/2021 - M1/M2 Process Area, employees were exposed to respiratory hazards when performing activities such as maintenance tasks that required a line break and M2 Plant Lab Plant sampling and to potentially delayed medical treatment when information pertaining to the hazards of the highly hazardous chemicals in the process, as often found on safety data sheets, were not obtained or developed for all of the chemicals in the M2 Process such as, but not limited to, Perfluoroisobutene or PFiB and Telomer or class of chemical formed from combination of hydrogen chloride and difluorcarbene (CF2), resulting in compounds with formula H(CF2)nCl, where n equals the number of difluorocarbenes.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.119 D03 I G

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Dec 30, 2021
Abate by
Jan 27, 2022
Penalty
Initial $13,653 · Current $0 Reduced

Hazardous substances P345V105

29 CFR  1910.119(d)(3)(i)(G): Information pertaining to the equipment in the process did not include material and energy balances for processes built after May 26, 1982:   (a) On or about 7/2/2021 - M1/M2 Process Area, when the M2 Process P&ID Material Balance PFD-10 did not accurately reflect all of the chemicals in the process,  employees were exposed to respiratory hazards from chemicals such as, but not limited to, Perfluoroisobutene (PFiB), Octafluoroisomethylether (OIME), Methanol (MeOH), and Vinylidene Fluoride (VdF) and flammable hazards from chemicals such as, but not limited to, Methanol (MeOH) and Vinylidene Fluoride (VdF) that were used as an input or were formed as part of the Tetrafluoroethylene (TFE) manufacturing process.  Employees operated the process, performed maintenance tasks that required a line break, worked and walked in areas where process gas was allowed to vent to the atmosphere while purging equipment and piping, and processed M2 process samples.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $13653
  • — Z (S) $13653

1910.119 F01 III B

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Dec 30, 2021
Abate by
Mar 28, 2022
Penalty
Initial $13,653 · Current $10,835 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.119(f)(1)(iii)(B): The employer did not develop and implement written operating procedures that provided clear instructions for safely conducting activities involved in each covered process consistent with the process safety information that addressed health and safety considerations, such as precautions necessary to prevent exposure, including engineering controls, administrative controls, and personal protective equipment.   (a) On or about 7/2/2021 - M1/M2 Process Area, employees were exposed to respiratory hazards from hazardous chemicals such as, but not limited to, Chlorotrifluoroethylene (CTFE), Chlorofluoromethane (R-31), Hexafluoropropylene (HFP), and Trifluoromethane (R-23) when performing activities such as maintenance tasks that required a line break and M2 Plant Lab Plant sampling and the written procedures did not clearly identify the required level of respiratory protection.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $10835
  • — C (S) $13653
  • — Z (S) $13653

1910.134 D01 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Dec 30, 2021
Abate by
Mar 28, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(d)(1)(i): Selection of appropriate respirators was not based on the respiratory hazard(s) to which the worker was exposed and user factors that affect respirator performance and reliability:   (a) On or about 7/2/2021 - M1/M2 Process Area, employees were exposed to respiratory hazards from hazardous chemicals such as, but not limited to, Chlorotrifluoroethylene (CTFE), Chlorofluoromethane (R-31), Hexafluoropropylene (HFP), and Trifluoromethane (R-23) when performing activities such as maintenance tasks that required a line break and M2 Plant Lab Plant sampling and the employer had not selected an appropriate respirator.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Dec 30, 2021
Abate by
Mar 28, 2022
Penalty
Initial $13,653 · Current $10,835 Reduced

Hazardous substances 1460P345

Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employee(s) that were exposed to respiratory hazards.  On or about July 2-3, 2021, at the M1/M2 Process Area, night shift employees were exposed to a respiratory hazard, where clear operating instructions for conducting temporary operations in connection with the T-250 bypass procedure prd-m2-0060 were not provided.  Among other methods, feasible means of abatement consist of providing clear operating instructions for utilizing R-22 gas from J-1 in the T-250 bypass procedure prd-m2-0060
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $10835
  • — C (S) $13653
  • — Z (S) $13653

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Dec 30, 2021
Abate by
Mar 28, 2022
Penalty
Initial $13,653 · Current $10,835 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employee(s) that were exposed to respiratory hazards.  On or about July 2-3, 2021, at the M1/M2 Process Area, night shift employees were exposed to a respiratory hazard, where the employer did not select and provide proper personel protective equipment (PPE) in connection with the performance of the T-250 bypass procedure prd-m2-0060.  Among other methods, feasible means of abatement consist of providing supplied-air respirators to employees participating in the R-22 purge in connection with the T-250 bypass procedure prd-m2-0060.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $10835
  • — C (S) $13653
  • — Z (S) $13653

1910.134 D01 III

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Dec 30, 2021
Abate by
Mar 28, 2022
Penalty
Initial $13,653 · Current $10,830 Reduced

Hazardous substances 1460P345

29 CFR  1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminant's chemical state and physical form:   (a) On or about 07/02/2021 - M1/M2 Process Area, employees were exposed to respiratory hazards from unknown chemicals and known chemicals such as, but not limited to, Perfluoroisobutene (PFiB), Perfluorocyclobutane (C-318), Octafluoroisomethylether (OIME), and Hydrogen Fluoride (HF) when the 3RT Product process stream was vented to atmosphere while the employees were performing work to return T250 to normal operations as part of the "M2 - By-Passing T250 for Maintenance" procedure prd-m2-0060 and the employer had not conducted air sampling or monitoring identify all of the chemicals and the concentration of the chemicals in the air.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $10830
  • — C (S) $13653
  • — Z (S) $13653

1910.1200 G11

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Dec 30, 2021
Abate by
Mar 28, 2022
Penalty
Initial $13,653 · Current $10,830 Reduced

Hazardous substances P345

29 CFR  1910.1200(g)(11):  Safety data sheets were not made readily available, upon request, to designated representatives, the Assistant Secretary, and the Director, in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.1020(e):  (a) On or about 8/12/2021 - M1/M2 Process Area, employees were exposed to respiratory hazards when the employer did not provide twenty-four safety data sheets for the hazardous chemicals in the M2 Process such as, but not limited to Perfluoroisobutene (PFib) and Hydrogen Fluoride (HF) to the Assistant Secretary in a timely matter after written requests on 8/12/2021, 9/1/2021, 11/1/2021, and 12/8/2021.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $10830
  • — C (S) $13653
  • — Z (S) $13653

5(a)(1)

Repeat Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Dec 30, 2021
Abate by
Mar 28, 2024
Penalty
Initial $136,532 · Current $110,000 Reduced

Hazardous substances 1460P345

Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employee(s) that were exposed to respiratory hazards.  On or about July 2-3, 2021, at the M1/M2 Process Area, night shift employees were exposed to a respiratory hazard from atmospheric process gas while performing the T-250 bypass procedure prd-m2-0060.  Among other methods, feasible means of abatement consist of using R-22 gas from J-1 for the R-22 purge in the T-250 bypass procedure prd-m2-0060, and venting the purge gas to the incinerator.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (R) $110000
  • — C (W) $136532
  • — Z (W) $136532

View Daikin America, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345474142.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.