Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: RICHARD NUESS BUILDING AND ROOFING CONTRACTOR, INC.

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of RICHARD NUESS BUILDING AND ROOFING CONTRACTOR, INC. in 6949 HAMILTON MIDDLETOWN RD., FRANKLIN, OH 45005 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 345486732.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Richard Nuess Building and Roofing Contractor, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Richard Nuess Building and Roofing Contractor, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
6949 HAMILTON MIDDLETOWN RD.
City
FRANKLIN
State
OH
ZIP
45005
Mailing
4024 BROOKDALE DRIVE, DAYTON, OH 45429
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.416 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Sep 16, 2021
Abate by
Nov 3, 2021
Penalty
Initial $3,686 · Current $1,450 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.416(a)(1):No employer shall permit an employee to work in such proximity to any part of an electric power circuit that the employee could contact the electric power circuit in the course of work, unless the employee is protected against electric shock by deenergizing the circuit and grounding it or by guarding it effectively by insulation or other means.  A.) On or about August 18, 2021, while re-roofing a residential structure employees were working near the electrical service coming into the residential structure in that an employee made contact with the service line and was shocked. The electrical service is 100 amp, 120/240 volt.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1450
  • — Z (S) $3686

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Sep 16, 2021
Penalty
Initial $3,686 · Current $1,450 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13):"Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.  A.) On or about August 18, 2021, while roofing a residential structure employees were not utilizing any type of fall protection system. Fall height was measured to be 14'-0" with a roof slope of 4/12.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1450
  • — Z (S) $3686

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Sep 16, 2021
Abate by
Nov 3, 2021
Penalty
Initial $3,686 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.503(a)(1):The employer shall provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards. The program shall enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and shall train each employee in the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards.  A.) The employer did not train his employees in the recognition and avoidance of fall hazards in that employees were working on the roof of a residential structure without utilizing any type of fall protection system.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $3686

View Richard Nuess Building and Roofing Contractor, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345486732.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.