Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: CRAIG HOMECARE, INC.

Referral inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of CRAIG HOMECARE, INC. in 5661 TELEGRAPH ROAD #5B, SAINT LOUIS, MO 63129 (NAICS 621610). OSHA activity number 345520993.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Craig Homecare, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Craig Homecare, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
5661 TELEGRAPH ROAD #5B
City
SAINT LOUIS
State
MO
ZIP
63129
Mailing
5661 TELEGRAPH ROAD #5B, SAINT LOUIS, MO 63129
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
621610
Employees
58
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 55 exposed
Issued
Jan 10, 2022
Abate by
Feb 28, 2022
Penalty
Initial $13,653 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.134(c)(1):In any workplace where respirators were necessary to protect the health of the employees' or whenever respirators were required by the employer, the employer did not establish and implement a written respiratory protection program with worksite-specific procedures.   Location: 5661 Telegraph Road Suite # 5, Saint Louis, Missouri:  On or about September  9, 2021, where workers were provided and required to wear N95 respirators for protection against COVID-19 infections, the employer did not develop and implement a written respiratory protection program.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $13653

1910.134 E01

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 55 exposed
Issued
Jan 10, 2022
Abate by
Feb 28, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(e)(1):General. The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee is fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace.   Location: 5661, Suite # 5, Telegraph Road, Saint Louis, Missouri:  On or about September 9, 2021, where workers were provided and required to wear N95 respirators for protection against COVID-19 infections,  while carrying for suspected or confirmed COVID-19 patients, the employer did not provide medical evaluation to the workers prior to allowing them to use the respirators.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 55 exposed
Issued
Jan 10, 2022
Abate by
Feb 28, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(f)(2):The employer did not ensure that an employees using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were fit tested prior to initial use of the respirators:  Location: 5661, Suite  # 5, Telegraph Road, Saint Louis, Missouri:  On or about September 9, 2021, where workers were provided and required to wear N95 respirators for protection against COVID-19 infections,  while carrying for suspected or confirmed COVID-19 patients, the employer did fit test the workers prior to allowing them to use the respirators.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 55 exposed
Issued
Jan 10, 2022
Abate by
Feb 28, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(k):Training and information.  The employer did not  provide effective training to employees who were required to use respirators.   Location: 5661, Suite # 5, Telegraph Road, Saint Louis, Missouri;  On or about September 9, 2021, where the workers we provided and required to wear N95 respirators for protection against COVID-19 infection, the employer did not provide the workers an effective training on the use and limitation of the respirators.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345520993.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.