Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: EMBASSY HEALTHCARE, INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of EMBASSY HEALTHCARE, INC. in 15028 OLD LINCOLN WAY, DALTON, OH 44618 (NAICS 623312). OSHA activity number 345529135.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Embassy Healthcare, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Embassy Healthcare, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
15028 OLD LINCOLN WAY
City
DALTON
State
OH
ZIP
44618
Mailing
15028 OLD LINCOLN WAY, DALTON, OH 44618
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
623312
Employees
80
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.502 F02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 95 exposed
Issued
Dec 6, 2021
Abate by
Dec 27, 2021
Penalty
Initial $9,753 · Current $6,437 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.502(f)(2)(i):The employer did not ensure that a respirator was used in accordance with 29 CFR � 1910.134 when employees have exposure to a person with suspected or confirmed COVID-19.  On or about September 13, 2021, the employer did not ensure that employees required to utilize N95 respirators due to positive staff and resident cases of COVID-19 used it in accordance with 1910.134 in that fit testing, medical evaluations, and training on the respiratory protection program had not been conducted.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $6437
  • — Z (S) $9753

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 95 exposed
Issued
Dec 6, 2021
Abate by
Dec 27, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(e)(1):The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:   On or about September 13, 2021, the employer did not ensure that employees received medical evaluations prior to requiring them to utilize N95 respiratory protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 95 exposed
Issued
Dec 6, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(f)(2):Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator:  On or about September 13, 2021, the employer did not ensure that employees received fit tests prior to requiring them to utilize N95 respiratory protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 95 exposed
Issued
Dec 6, 2021
Abate by
Dec 27, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(k)(1):29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1): The employer did not provide effective training that covered the required elements in 1910.134(k)(1)(i) - (vii):  On or about September 13, 2021, the employer did not provide training as part of a respiratory protection program to employees required to wear N95 respirators.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Deleted Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 95 exposed
Issued
Dec 6, 2021
Abate by
Dec 27, 2021
Penalty
Initial $5,851 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.1200(e)(1):The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  On or about September 13, 2021, where employees work with and around chemicals including but not limited to disinfectants, the employer had not developed and implemented a written hazard communication program.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $5851

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 95 exposed
Issued
Dec 6, 2021
Abate by
Feb 28, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $2,925
29 CFR  1910.1200(h)(1):Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  On or about September 13, 2021 the employer had ensured that hazard communication training had been provided to employees that work with and around hazardous chemicals including, but not limited to Daco San II Bowl Cleaner, Neutra-Stat TB, and L.L. Destainer.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2925
  • — Z (S) $0

View Embassy Healthcare, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345529135.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.