Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: PUNINS CONSTRUCTION, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of PUNINS CONSTRUCTION, INC. in 620 LAFAYETTE RD., SEABROOK, NH 03874 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 345550065.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Punins Construction, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Punins Construction, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
620 LAFAYETTE RD.
City
SEABROOK
State
NH
ZIP
03874
Mailing
51 JEFFERSON ST. APT 2, MILFORD, MA 01757
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.20 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Mar 23, 2022
Abate by
Apr 4, 2022
Penalty
Initial $3,108 · Current $1,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs necessary to ensure compliance with the Occupational Safety and Health Standards such as a safety and health program with policy, hazard assessment, and work site rules was not developed and/or implemented at this job site:  Site - On or about September 28, 2021, the employer did not initiate and maintain an accident and injury prevention program where employees were exposed to overhead hazards, falls and defective equipment on the jobsite.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1500
  • — Z (S) $3108

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Mar 23, 2022
Abate by
Apr 4, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s):  Site - On or about September 28, 2021, the employer did not provide for frequent and regular inspections of the jobsite, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person where employees were exposed to overhead hazards and defective equipment on the jobsite.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 23, 2022
Penalty
Initial $3,108 · Current $1,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.100(a):Employees were not protected by protective helmets while working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns:  Jobsite - On or about July 28, 2021, employees working to clean up debris on the ground were not protected from head injury where there was roofing activities occurring above them and they were not utilizing protective helmets.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1500
  • — Z (S) $3108

1926.552 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 23, 2022
Penalty
Initial $3,108 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.552(a)(1): The employer did not comply with manufacturer's specifications and limitations applicable to the operation of all hoists and elevators:   Site - On or about September 28, 2021, the employer did not comply with manufacturer specifications when assembling the RGC material hoist being used onsite where there were bolts missing from the splice plates joining the two pieces of track together.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $3108

1926.501 B13

Willful Gravity 10 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 23, 2022
Abate by
Apr 4, 2022
Penalty
Initial $29,005 · Current $7,000 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b).  a.) Jobsite - On September 28, 2021, employees working on stripping the back portion of the main building roof were not protected from a fall of approximately 24 feet from the eave and 28 feet from the peak where fall protection was not utilized.  b.) Jobsite - On September 29, 2021, following a closing conference on September 28, 2021 where the employer was informed of the requirement for fall protection, employees were working on an additional roof at the back of the building and were not protected from a fall of approximately 10 feet where fall protection was again not utilized.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (W) $7000
  • — Z (W) $29005

View Punins Construction, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345550065.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.