Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,124Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-25 Last loaded 2026-08-28

OSHA Inspection: SOLOMON COLORS, INC.

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of SOLOMON COLORS, INC. in 4050 NORTH COLOR PLANT RD, SPRINGFIELD, IL 62702 (NAICS 325130). OSHA activity number 345551055.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Solomon Colors, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Solomon Colors, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
4050 NORTH COLOR PLANT RD
City
SPRINGFIELD
State
IL
ZIP
62702
Mailing
P.O. BOX 8288, SPRINGFIELD, IL 62791
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
325130
Employees
120
Ownership type
Private (A)

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 13, 2021
Abate by
Jan 31, 2022
Penalty
Initial $9,655 · Current $4,823 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.147(c)(4)(i):  Procedures had not been developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy while employees were engaged in activities covered by this section:  On or about October 20, 2021, an employee was exposed to potential amputation hazards during clean down on the two Slide Gates in the Granular Department, and the employer had not developed, documented, or utilized equipment specific energy control procedure. This procedure would include the following:  a.	A specific statement of the intended use of the procedure, b.	Specific procedural steps for shutting down, isolating, blocking and securing machines or equipment to control hazardous energy, c.	Specific procedural steps for the placement, removal and transfer of lockout devices and the responsibility for them, d.	Specific requirements for testing a machine or equipment to determine and verify the effectiveness of lockout devices, tagout devices, and other energy control measures.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $4823
  • · Z (S) $9655

1910.147 C07 I A

Serious Gravity 10 4 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Dec 13, 2021
Abate by
Jan 31, 2022
Penalty
Initial $13,516 · Current $6,758 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.147(c)(7)(i)(A):  Authorized employee(s) had not received training in the recognition of applicable hazardous energy sources, the type and magnitude of the energy available in the workplace, and the methods and means necessary for energy isolation and control:  On or about September 24, 2021, employees were exposed to amputation hazards while performing maintenance and servicing operations, and the employer had not provided each employee with authorized lockout training.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $6758
  • · Z (S) $13516

1910.147 D

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 13, 2021
Abate by
Jan 31, 2022
Penalty
Initial $13,516 · Current $6,758 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.147(d):  The established procedure for the application of energy control (the lockout or tagout procedures) had not covered the actions listed in and had not been done in sequence as required by 29 CFR 1910.147(d)(1)-(6):   On or about September 24, 2021, an employee was exposed to amputation hazards and received an amputation injury, while checking beneath the Blender for pigment clogging, and the employer failed to implement energy control application steps as the machine was not shut down or turned off to perform the servicing work [per the 1910.147(d)(2) requirements}.  As a result, the remaining applicable energy control elements, involving machine isolation [(d)(3)], LOTO device application [(d)(4)], dissipation of residual energy [(d)(5)(i)], and verification of isolation [(d)(6)], were not implemented to protect the employee from machine servicing hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $6758
  • · Z (S) $13516

1910.178 Q07

Other-than-serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 13, 2021
Abate by
Jan 31, 2022
Penalty
Initial $9,655 · Current $4,823 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.178(q)(7):  Powered industrial truck(s) which were used on a round-the-clock basis had not been examined for defects after each shift:   On or about September 27, 2021, employees were exposed to potential safety hazards associated with the operation of forklifts at the facility, and the employer had not performed forklift inspections on second shift in the Granular Department.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $4823
  • · Z (S) $9655

View Solomon Colors, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 345551055.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.