OSHA Inspection: FRANCISCO G. MACIAS SANCHEZ

Issued

Nov 1, 2021

Abate by

Nov 12, 2021

Penalty

Initial $2,341 · Current $2,341

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.100(a):Employees were not protected by protective helmets while working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns:  New residential construction located on Lot #11, Second level top plate: On or about 10/01/2021, the employer exposed employees to struck-by hazards, in that head protection was not provided to employees installing roof trusses which were hoisted directly over head by a mobile crane.

Issued

Nov 1, 2021

Abate by

Nov 12, 2021

Penalty

Initial $2,341 · Current $2,341

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.102(a)(1):  Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical agents:  New residential construction located on Lot #11, Second level top plate: On or about 10/01/2021, the employer exposed employees to struck-by hazards while operating nail guns, in that protective eyewear was not provided to employees operating pneumatic framing nail guns at 120 PSI while engaged in roof truss installation.

Issued

Nov 1, 2021

Abate by

Nov 12, 2021

Penalty

Initial $4,096 · Current $4,096

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m)  or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b), nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502:    New residential construction located on Lot #11, Second level top plate: On or about 10/01/2021, the employer exposed employees to fall hazards of over 20-feet to the lower level, in that a fall protection system was not provided to employees engaged in roof truss installation using the top outer plates as a walking/working surface.