CINCINNATI, OH —
OSHA Inspection: LUIS CAMACHO
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of LUIS CAMACHO in 5855 MIAMI RD., CINCINNATI, OH 45243 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 345580047.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- LUIS CAMACHO
- Site address
- 5855 MIAMI RD.
- City
- CINCINNATI
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 45243
- Mailing
- 1008 BELLE AVE. APT B, HAMILTON, OH 45015
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Nov 1, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $4,096 · Current $4,096
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):"Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems. On October 12, 2021, located on the east side of a residential roof structure, employees were exposed to a fall hazard not utilizing any fall protection system while standing at the edge of the low pitch roof throwing shingles into a dump truck below. Potential fall height measured to be 10 feet with a roof pitch of 4/12.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4096
- — Z (S) $4096
1926.503 B01
- Issued
- Nov 1, 2021
- Abate by
- Dec 20, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $4,096 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1):The employer shall verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written certification record. The written certification record shall contain the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer. If the employer relies on training conducted by another employer or completed prior to the effective date of this section, the certification record shall indicate the date the employer determined the prior training was adequate rather than the date of actual training. On October 12, 2021, located on the east side of a residential roof structure, employees were exposed to a fall hazard performing roofing work without the use of a fall protection system in that the employer did not have written certification to verify the employees had been trained in fall protection. Potential fall height measured to be 10 feet with a roof pitch of 4/12.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $4096
1926.502 A02
- Issued
- Nov 1, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $4,096 · Current $2,048 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(a)(2):Employers shall provide and install all fall protection systems required by this subpart for an employee, and shall comply with all other pertinent requirements of this subpart before that employee begins the work that necessitates the fall protection: (A) Guardrail systems; (B) Safety net systems; or (C) Personal fall protection systems, such as personal fall arrest, travel restraint, or positioning systems. On October 12, 2021, located on the east side of a residential roof structure, employees were exposed to a fall hazard performing roofing work in that the employer failed to install a fall protection system before the employee performed the roofing work. Potential fall height measured to be 10 feet with a roof pitch of 4/12.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2048
- — Z (S) $4096
More inspections at Luis Camacho
View Luis Camacho's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345580047.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.