Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: LUIS CAMACHO

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of LUIS CAMACHO in 5855 MIAMI RD., CINCINNATI, OH 45243 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 345580047.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Luis Camacho — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Luis Camacho is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
LUIS CAMACHO
Site address
5855 MIAMI RD.
City
CINCINNATI
State
OH
ZIP
45243
Mailing
1008 BELLE AVE. APT B, HAMILTON, OH 45015
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 1, 2021
Penalty
Initial $4,096 · Current $4,096
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13):"Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.  On October 12, 2021, located on the east side of a residential roof structure, employees were exposed to a fall hazard not utilizing any fall protection system while standing at the edge of the low pitch roof throwing shingles into a dump truck below. Potential fall height measured to be 10 feet with a roof pitch of 4/12.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4096
  • — Z (S) $4096

1926.503 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Nov 1, 2021
Abate by
Dec 20, 2021
Penalty
Initial $4,096 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.503(b)(1):The employer shall verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written certification record. The written certification record shall contain the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer. If the employer relies on training conducted by another employer or completed prior to the effective date of this section, the certification record shall indicate the date the employer determined the prior training was adequate rather than the date of actual training.  On October 12, 2021, located on the east side of a residential roof structure, employees were exposed to a fall hazard performing roofing work without the use of a fall protection system in that the employer did not have written certification to verify the employees had been trained in fall protection. Potential fall height measured to be 10 feet with a roof pitch of 4/12.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $4096

1926.502 A02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 1, 2021
Penalty
Initial $4,096 · Current $2,048 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.502(a)(2):Employers shall provide and install all fall protection systems required by this subpart for an employee, and shall comply with all other pertinent requirements of this subpart before that employee begins the work that necessitates the fall protection: (A)  Guardrail systems;  (B)  Safety net systems; or  (C)  Personal fall protection systems, such as personal fall arrest, travel restraint, or positioning systems.  On October 12, 2021, located on the east side of a residential roof structure, employees were exposed to a fall hazard performing roofing work in that the employer failed to install a fall protection system before the employee performed the roofing work. Potential fall height measured to be 10 feet with a roof pitch of 4/12.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2048
  • — Z (S) $4096

View Luis Camacho's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345580047.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.