BEDFORD, NH —
OSHA Inspection: KL UNITED CONSTRUCTION LLC
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of KL UNITED CONSTRUCTION LLC in 284 RT 101, BEDFORD, NH 03110 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 345580096.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- KL UNITED CONSTRUCTION LLC
- Site address
- 284 RT 101
- City
- BEDFORD
- State
- NH
- ZIP
- 03110
- Mailing
- 23 STILLMAN STREET, FRAMINGHAM, MA 01702
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.20 B01
- Issued
- Nov 9, 2021
- Abate by
- Nov 30, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $2,926 · Current $1,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1):The employer did not initiate and maintain accident prevention programs as necessary to comply with this part: Site- Employees were not protected from fall and struck by hazards where the employer did not maintain an accident prevention program.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1500
- — Z (S) $2926
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- Nov 9, 2021
- Abate by
- Nov 30, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $2,926 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s) Site- Employees were not protected from fall and struck by hazards where the employer did not have a competent person conduct frequent and regular inspections of the jobsite.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2926
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Nov 9, 2021
- Abate by
- Nov 30, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $2,926 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: Site- Employees exposed to a fall hazard while working from a building ledge and roof were not provided with fall protection training.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2926
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Nov 9, 2021
- Abate by
- Nov 16, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $2,926 · Current $1,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees were not protected by protective helmets while working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns:(a)(LOCATION)(SPECIFIC OPERATION(S) AND/OR CONDITIONS) Site- An employee working from the ground was not protected from head injury where head protection was not worn.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1500
- — Z (S) $2926
1926.501 B01
- Issued
- Nov 9, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $4,096 · Current $1,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems. Site- Employees working from a building ledge and roof were not protected from a fall of approximately 15 feet where fall protection was not utilized.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1500
- — Z (S) $4096
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Nov 9, 2021
- Abate by
- Nov 16, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $2,926 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: Site- Employees using aluminum extension ladders to access a roof and building ledge were not protected from a fall hazard where the ladders did not extend three feet above the landing surface.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2926
More inspections at KL United Construction LLC
View KL United Construction LLC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in NH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345580096.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.