Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: 2014 HEALTH, LLC, DBA CHICAGO BEHAVIORAL HOSPITAL

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of 2014 HEALTH, LLC, DBA CHICAGO BEHAVIORAL HOSPITAL in 555 WILSON LANE, DES PLAINES, IL 60016 (NAICS 622210). OSHA activity number 345585111.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch 2014 Health, LLC, DBA Chicago Behavioral Hospital — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for 2014 Health, LLC, DBA Chicago Behavioral Hospital is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
555 WILSON LANE
City
DES PLAINES
State
IL
ZIP
60016
Mailing
555 WILSON LN, DES PLAINES, IL 60016
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
622210
Employees
354
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 16, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:   a) On or about September 15 through September 24, 2021, employees, including Program Therapists/Social Worker(s) and Mental Health Technician(s), were required to use N95 filtering facepiece respirators including but not limited to Uline Model S-9632 and/or 3M Model Aura 9205+, due to the presence of a resident of the facility who tested positive for COVID-19.  A written respiratory protection program was not developed and implemented in the facility.    No abatement certification or documentation is required for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 16, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:   a) On or about September 15 through September 24, 2021, employee(s) were required to use N95 filtering facepiece respirators including but not limited to Uline Model S-9632 and/or 3M Model Aura 9205+, due to the presence of a resident of the facility who tested positive for COVID-19.  Employees, including Program Therapists/Social Worker(s) and Mental Health Technician(s), had not been medically evaluated prior to the required respirator use.  No abatement certification or documentation is required for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 F02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 16, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator:   a) On or about September 15 through September 24, 2021, employee(s) were required to use N95 filtering facepiece respirators including but not limited to Uline Model S-9632 and/or 3M Model Aura 9205+, due to the presence of a resident of the facility who tested positive for COVID-19.  Employees, including Program Therapists/Social Worker(s) and Mental Health Technician(s), had not been fit tested using a qualitative (QLFT) or quantitative (QLFT) method prior to the required respirator use.  No abatement certification or documentation is required for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.502 C02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 16, 2021
Abate by
Jan 5, 2022
Penalty
Initial $1,095 · Current $610 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.502(c)(2): The employer's COVID-19 plan was not in writing.   a) On or about September 15 through September 24, 2021, a written COVID-19 plan that included a designated safety coordinator with authority to ensure compliance, a workplace-specific hazard assessment, involvement of non-managerial employees in hazard assessment and plan development/implementation, and policies and procedures to minimize the risk of transmission of COVID-19 to employees, was not developed and implemented.  In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(c), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $610
  • — Z (O) $1095

1910.502 F01 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 16, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.502(f)(1)(i): Employers did not provide, and did not ensure that employees wear, facemasks that meet the definition in paragraph (b) of this section.  a) On or about October 18, 2021, the employer did not ensure that employees wore facemasks that met the definition in paragraph (b) of this section. Healthcare workers wore a cloth mask and did not wear a surgical, medical procedure, dental, or isolation mask that were FDA-cleared, authorized by an FDA EUA, or offered or distributed as described in an FDA enforcement policy when working inside the hospital.  No abatement certification or documentation is required for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.504 D02 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 16, 2021
Abate by
Feb 9, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.504(d)(2)(i): The employer did not ensure that each employee who uses a tight-fitting respirator performs a user seal check to ensure that the respirator is properly seated to the face each time the respirator is put on using, the methods listed in paragraphs (d)(2)(i)(A) or (B) of this section.     a) On or about October 18, 2021, the employer failed to ensure that employee(s) voluntarily using a N95 filtering facepiece respirator instead of required surgical masks, performed a user seal check to ensure that the respirator is properly seated to the face.  In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(c), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View 2014 Health, LLC, DBA Chicago Behavioral Hospital's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345585111.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.