OSHA Inspection: DANIEL RODRIGUEZ CHAVEZ

Issued

Nov 4, 2021

Penalty

Initial $2,341 · Current $2,341

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee use appropriate eye/face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation:  21514 James Charles: On or about October 21, 2021, employees were exposed to a struck-by hazard of flying projectiles while using a pneumatic nail gun without the use of safety glasses.

Issued

Nov 4, 2021

Penalty

Initial $2,926 · Current $2,926

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):   21514 James Charles: On or about October 21, 2021, and at times prior thereto, employees were exposed to a fall hazard greater than 6 feet while installing the decking on the third level of a residential construction site without fall protection.

Issued

Nov 4, 2021

Abate by

Dec 23, 2021

Penalty

Initial $2,926 · Current $2,926

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.503(a)(1):The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:   21514 James Charles: On or about October 21, 2021, and at times prior thereto, employees were exposed to a fall hazard greater than 6 feet while installing the decking on the third level of a residential construction site without fall hazard recognition.