Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: NELSON GONZALEZ

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of NELSON GONZALEZ in 35 BURNSIDE AVENUE, WOONSOCKET, RI 02895 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 345591499.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Nelson Gonzalez — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Nelson Gonzalez is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
NELSON GONZALEZ
Site address
35 BURNSIDE AVENUE
City
WOONSOCKET
State
RI
ZIP
02895
Mailing
43 HALTON STREET, PROVIDENCE, RI 02907
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
2
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 2022
Abate by
May 23, 2022
Penalty
Initial $349 · Current $349
29 CFR  1903.19(c)(1):The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated:  (a) Establishment:  As of April 19, 2022, the employer had not certified to OSHA that the abatement had been completed for Citation 1, Item 2 from inspection number 1559149, issued on 1/20/2022, with a final order date of 2/15/2022.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $349

1903.19 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 19, 2022
Abate by
May 23, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1903.19(d)(1):The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required:  (a) Establishment:  As of April 19, 2022, the employer had not provided the required abatement documentation to OSHA for Citation 1, Item 2 from inspection number 1559149, issued on 1/20/2022, with a final order date of 2/15/2022.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 20, 2022
Penalty
Initial $4,351 · Current $4,351
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employees provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b).  a) Jobsite: On or about October 21, 2021, employees were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 16 feet while performing roofing work without any means of fall protection.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4351

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 20, 2022
Abate by
Mar 8, 2022
Penalty
Initial $4,351 · Current $4,351
29 CFR  1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards.  a) Jobsite: On or about October 21, 2021, an employee was not provided with fall protection training as a means of recognizing the hazards of falling and the methods of protection, while working on roof surfaces approximately 16 feet above the lower level.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4351

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 20, 2022
Penalty
Initial $3,108 · Current $3,108
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed.  a) Jobsite: On or about October 21, 2021, employees were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 16-feet while ascending and descending a roof from an extension ladder, where the side rails of the ladder did not extend at least 3 feet above the upper landing surface.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3108

View Nelson Gonzalez's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345591499.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.