CHAMPAIGN, IL —
OSHA Inspection: KRAFT HEINZ FOODS COMPANY
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of KRAFT HEINZ FOODS COMPANY in 1701 W. BRADLEY AVENUE, CHAMPAIGN, IL 61821 (NAICS 424420). OSHA activity number 345607626.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- KRAFT HEINZ FOODS COMPANY
- Site address
- 1701 W. BRADLEY AVENUE
- City
- CHAMPAIGN
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 61821
- Mailing
- 1701 W. BRADLEY AVENUE, CHAMPAIGN, IL 61821
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 424420
- Employees
- 1024
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.132 D01 I
- Issued
- Feb 4, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $14,502 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1)(i): The employer did not select and have each affected employee use, the types of personal protective equipment that would protect the affected employee(s) from the hazards identified in the hazard assessment: On or about October 1, 2021, an employee was exposed to thermal burns while performing sanitation functions on the Heat Exchange on Line 35 in the Signatures Department, and the employer did not require employees use the personal protective equipment identified in the company's hazard assessment, including but not limited to, arm length gloves and face shield.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $14502
1910.147 C04 II B
- Issued
- Feb 4, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $14,502 · Current $10,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii)(B): The energy control procedure did not clearly and specifically outline specific procedural steps for shutting down, isolating, blocking and securing machines or equipment to control hazardous energy: On or about October 1, 2021, an employee was exposed to thermal burns while performing sanitation functions on the Heat Exchange on Line 35 in the Signatures Department, and the written lockout procedure did not contain specific procedural steps for shutting down, isolating, blocking and securing machines or equipment to control hazardous hot water energy.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $10000
- — Z (S) $14502
1910.147 D
- Issued
- Feb 4, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $14,502 · Current $12,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(d): The established procedure for the application of energy control (the lockout or tagout procedures) did not cover the actions listed in and was not done in sequence as required by 29 CFR 1910.147(d)(1)-(6): On or about October 1, 2021, an employee was exposed to thermal burns while performing sanitation functions on the Heat Exchange on Line 35 in the Signatures Department. The employer failed to implement energy control application steps as the machine was not shut down or turned off to perform the servicing work [per the 1910.147(d)(2) requirements]. As a result, the remaining applicable energy control elements, involving machine isolation [(d)(3)], LOTO device application [(d)(4)], dissipation of residual energy [(d)(5)(i)], and verification of isolation [(d)(6)], were not implemented to protect employees from machine servicing hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $12400
- — Z (S) $14502
1910.132 D02
- Issued
- Feb 4, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $1,279 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify, through a written certification, the identity of the workplace evaluated, the person certifying that the evaluation had been performed, and the date the hazard assessment was done: On or about October 1, 2021, an employee was exposed to thermal burns while performing sanitation functions on the Heat Exchange on Line 35 in the Signatures Department, and the employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed through a written certification. This written certification would identify: a. Workplace evaluated, b. Person certifying that the evaluation had been performed; c. Date of the hazard assessment, and d. Document as a certification of hazard assessment.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $1279
More inspections at Kraft Heinz Foods Company
View Kraft Heinz Foods Company's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 424420)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345607626.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.