LENEXA, KS —
OSHA Inspection: OMAR CASTRO FRAMING
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of OMAR CASTRO FRAMING in 8900 MAURER COURT, LENEXA, KS 66219 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 345619894.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- OMAR CASTRO FRAMING
- Site address
- 8900 MAURER COURT
- City
- LENEXA
- State
- KS
- ZIP
- 66219
- Mailing
- 1413 STATE AVENUE, KANSAS CITY, KS 66102
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.178 L01 I
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $3108.00 · Current $3108.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer had not ensured that each powered industrial truck operator was competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in paragraph (l) [Reference 29 CFR 1926.602(d) for construction]: Employee(s) engaged in operating a powered industrial truck (Lull telescopic boom lift) at 8900 Maurer Court, Lenexa, Kansas, to raise framing materials above ground and to move materials around the job site were exposed to struck by / crushing hazards due to not all employees were instructed in the recognition of hazards associated with operating a powered industrial lift.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3108
1910.178 P01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $1865.00 · Current $1865.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(p)(1): Powered industrial truck(s) with defect(s) or in any way unsafe had not been withdrawn from service until restored to safe operating condition(s): Employee(s) engaged in operating a powered industrial truck (Lull) at building 8 located at 8900 Maurer Court, Lenexa, Kansas to raise materials above ground were exposed to struck by / crushing hazards due to no functioning horn to warn workers whom may walk inadvertently into the vehicle's pathway.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $1865
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $1865.00 · Current $1865.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met(Construction Reference: 1926.59): Employees engaged in construction activities were exposed to chemical hazards in that the employer had not developed a hazard communication program to inform employees of the hazards associated with the chemicals such as gasoline or other hazardous chemicals that were being used at 8900 Maurer Court, Lenexa, Kansas.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $1865
1910.1200 G08
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $1865.00 · Current $1865.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8): The employer did not maintain in the workplace copies of the required safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical, and did not ensure that they were readily accessible during each work shift to employees when they were in their work area(s)(Construction Reference: 1926.59): Employee(s) engaged in working with gasoline and other hazardous chemicals that were being used at 8900 Maurer Court, Lenexa, Kansas, were exposed to skin irritation / carcinogen hazards due to no safety data sheets being readily accessible to employee(s).
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $1865
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $1865.00 · Current $1865.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): The employer did not provide employees with effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment, and whenever a new chemical hazard that the employees had not previously been trained about was introduced into their work area. Information and training was not designed to cover all applicable categories of hazards (e.g., flammability, carcinogenicity) or specific chemicals(Construction Reference: 1926.59): Employee(s) engaged in new commercial building construction at 8900 Maurer Court, Lenexa, Kansas were exposed to skin irritation / carcinogen hazards in that employee(s) had not received training on hazardous chemicals being used at the jobsite such as gasoline and other hazardous chemicals.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $1865
1926.20 B01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $4351.00 · Current $4351.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs necessary to ensure compliance with the Occupational Safety and Health Standards: Employee(s) engaged in framing work using fixed ladders, powered tools, fall protection, and etc. at 8900 Maurer Court, Lenexa, Kansas were exposed to struck by and fall hazards in that the employer had not developed nor implemented safety and health programs that provide construction hazard recognition guidelines to mitigate those hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4351
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $4351.00 · Current $4351.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his/her environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury: Employee(s) engaged in framing at a new commercial building under construction at 8900 Maurer Court, Lenexa, Kansas were exposed to struck by, crushing, and fall hazards in that employees were not instructed in the recognition of construction hazards and the methods to mitigate those hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4351
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $4351.00 · Current $4351.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system. (a) Employee(s) engaged in framing building 8 located at 8900 Maurer Court, Lenexa, Kansas were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 20 feet due to no fall protection system being provided for the framer on the east side of the building. (b) Employee(s) engaged in framing building 8 located at 8900 Maurer Court, Lenexa, Kansas were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 10-1/2 feet due to no fall protection system being provided for the south stairway where employees traveled between the first and second level. There were no fall protection system for the stairway for travel to the 2nd floor. (c) Employee(s) engaged in framing building 8 located at 8900 Maurer Court, Lenexa, Kansas were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 10-1/2 feet due to no fall protection system being provided for the south stairway where employees traveled between the first and second level. There were no fall protection system for the opening around the access/egress opening on the second floor.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4351
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
ENCINITAS, CA—2026-07-13
LOU RIDDLE CONSTRUCTION
MERIDIAN, ID—2026-07-10
IDAHO HOMES CONSTRUCTION LLC
KIMBERLY, WI—2026-07-10
ENRIQUE RESENDIC
METTER, GA—2026-07-10
M.A.P.C CONSTRUCTION, LLC
SLINGER, WI—2026-07-10
RAMIREZ HOME BUILDERS LLC
More inspections in KS
WICHITA, KS—2026-07-10
DIVERSIFIED SERVICES, INC.
PITTSBURG, KS—2026-07-09
PROGRESSIVE PRODUCTS INC
WICHITA, KS—2026-07-09
FIGEAC AERO NORTH AMERICA, INC.
PITTSBURG, KS—2026-07-08
CDL ELECTRIC
WICHITA, KS—2026-07-08
IBT, INC
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345619894.