Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: DELTA CABINET COMPANY, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of DELTA CABINET COMPANY, INC. in 696 INDUSTRIAL BOULEVARD, DELTA, CO 81416 (NAICS 337110). OSHA activity number 345622807.

Watch Delta Cabinet Company, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Delta Cabinet Company, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
696 INDUSTRIAL BOULEVARD
City
DELTA
State
CO
ZIP
81416
Mailing
696 INDUSTRIAL BOULEVARD, DELTA, CO 81416
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
337110
Employees
15
Ownership type
A

11 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.107 C05

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4144.00 · Current $2500.00 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.107(c)(5): Electrical equipment was not approved for locations containing both deposits of readily ignitable residues and explosive vapors were present in spraying area(s):  (a)	Delta Cabinet Company, Inc., at 696 Industrial Blvd., Delta, CO 81416:  On and before November 4, 2021, the employer did not ensure employees were protected from injury, in that a wall mounted exhaust fan was in use while located right above the work bench the employees used to spray highly flammable adhesive onto laminate and other products. Residue generated from months of overspray accumulated in excess of one eighth of an inch on the conduit and fan shrouding. This condition exposed employees to fire and explosion hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2500
  • — Z (S) $4144

1910.107 G02

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR  1910.107(g)(2):All spraying areas were not kept as free from the accumulation of deposits of combustible residues as practical, with cleaning conducted daily if necessary:  (a)	Delta Cabinet Company, Inc., at 696 Industrial Blvd., Delta, CO 81416:  On and before November 4, 2021, the employer did not ensure employees were protected from fire and explosion hazards in that adhesive residue generated from months of overspray accumulated in excess of one eighth of an inch in areas where spraying occurred. This condition exposed employees to fire and explosion hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4144.00 · Current $2500.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1):  A written respiratory protection program with worksite specific procedures, as specified in subparagraphs (c)(1)(i) through (ix) of this section, was not established and implemented where respirator(s) were necessary to protect the health of the employee or whenever respirator(s) were required by the employer:   (a) Delta Cabinet Company, Inc., at 696 Industrial Blvd., Delta, CO 81416:  On and before November 4, 2021, the employer did not have a written respiratory protection program with worksite specific procedures, as specified in subparagraphs (c)(1)(i) through (ix) of this section. The program was not established and implemented whenever respirators were required by the employer, in that the employer required the use of a cartridge style, tight fitting, half-mask, filtering face piece respirator, during spray finishing operations. This hazard exposed employees to chemical hazards.  Abatement Note:  The employer shall include in the program the following provisions of this section, as applicable:  1.	Procedures for selecting respirators for use in the workplace; 2.	Medical evaluations of employees required to use respirators; 3.	Fit testing procedures for tight-fitting respirators; 4.	Procedures for proper use of respirators in routine and reasonably foreseeable emergency situations; 5.	Procedures and schedules for cleaning, disinfecting, storing, inspecting, repairing, discarding, and otherwise maintaining respirators; 6.	Procedures to ensure adequate air quality, quantity, and flow of breathing air for atmosphere-supplying respirators; 7.	Training of employees in the respiratory hazards to which they are potentially exposed during routine and emergency situations;  8.	Training of employees in the proper use of respirators, including putting on and removing them, any limitations on their use, and their maintenance; and 9.	Procedures for regularly evaluating the effectiveness of the program.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2500
  • — Z (S) $4144

1910.134 D01 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminant's chemical state and physical form:  (a)	Delta Cabinet Company, Inc., at 696 Industrial Blvd., Delta, CO 81416:  On and before November 4, 2021, the employer did not evaluate the respiratory hazards in the workplace regarding the use of paints, stains, and solvents by employees.  This condition exposed employees to chemical hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 L01 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3315.00 · Current $1500.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training consisting of a combination of formal instruction (e.g., lecture, discussion, interactive computer learning, video tape, written material), practical training (demonstrations performed by the trainer and practical exercises performed by the trainee), and evaluation of the operator's performance in the workplace.   (a)	Delta Cabinet Company, Inc., at 696 Industrial Blvd., Delta, CO 81416:  On and before November 4, 2021, the employer did not ensure all forklift operators were trained in the operation of powered industrial trucks and that the operator's training consist of a combination of formal instruction, practical training, and evaluation of the operator's performance in the workplace. This condition exposed employees to struck-by hazards when employees operated forklifts without having been adequately trained and evaluated.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1500
  • — Z (S) $3315

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 10 4 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $5801.00 · Current $3500.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1):  Machine guarding was not provided to protect operators and other employees from hazards created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:  (a)	Delta Cabinet Company, Inc., at 696 Industrial Blvd., Delta, CO 81416:  On and before November 4, 2021, the employer did not ensure that machine guarding was provided to protect operators and other employees from hazards created by CNC Optimat BHO 200 in that the light curtain that is designed to prevent employees from entering the danger zone was inoperable. This condition exposed the employees to struck-by and laceration hazards.  (b)	Delta Cabinet Company, Inc., at 696 Industrial Blvd., Delta, CO 81416:  On and before November 4, 2021, the employer did not ensure that machine guarding was provided to protect operators and other employees from hazards created by point of operation and rotating parts, in that the Brandt KBS 440 edge bander rear panel's safety interlock system was manually overridden so that the machine would operate with the cover open exposing employees to hazards such as guillotine blades, rollers, and other mechanical moving parts. This condition exposed the employees to crushing, laceration, and amputation hazards.  (c)	Delta Cabinet Company, Inc., at 696 Industrial Blvd., Delta, CO 81416:  On and before November 4, 2021, the employer did not ensure that machine guarding was provided to protect operators and other employees from hazards created by point of operation and rotating parts, in that the Wienig Quattromat 23P  cover's safety interlock system was broken and machine still operated with the cover open exposing employees to hazards such as cutting blades, rollers, and other mechanical moving parts. This condition exposed the employees to crushing, laceration, and amputation hazards.  (d)	Delta Cabinet Company, Inc., at 696 Industrial Blvd., Delta, CO 81416:  On and before November 4, 2021, the employer did not ensure that machine guarding was provided to protect operators and other employees from hazards created by point of operation, in that the Miter saw table exposed employees to the rotating 16 inch saw blade due to its unguarded point of operation. This condition exposed the employees to laceration and amputation hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3500
  • — Z (S) $5801

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4144.00 · Current $2500.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1):  The employer did not develop, implement, and maintain a written hazard communication program which at least described how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g), and (h) of this section for labels and other forms of warning, safety data sheets, and employee information and training will be met, and which also included a hazardous chemicals list and methods used to inform employees of the hazards of non-routine tasks.  (a)	Delta Cabinet Company, Inc., at 696 Industrial Blvd., Delta, CO 81416:  On and before November 4, 2021, the employer did not develop, implement, and maintain a written hazard communication program which at least described how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g), and (h) of this section for labels and other forms of warning, safety data sheets, and employee information and training will be met, and which also included a hazardous chemicals list and methods used to inform employees of the hazards of non-routine tasks. This condition exposed the employees to hazards associated with chemicals, such as, but not limited to:  (1)    Spray adhesives (2)    Solvent based paints (3)    Solvent based stains (4)    Various solvents
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2500
  • — Z (S) $4144

1910.1200 G08

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8):  The employer did not ensure that Safety Data Sheets were readily accessible during each work shift to employees when they were in their work area(s).   (a)	Delta Cabinet Company, Inc., at 696 Industrial Blvd., Delta, CO 81416:  On and before November 4, 2021, the employer did not ensure that Safety Data Sheets were readily accessible during each work shift to employees when they were in their work area(s), such as but not limited to these types:  (1)    Spray adhesives (2)    Solvent based paints (3)    Solvent based stains (4)    Various solvents   This condition exposed employees to chemical hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4144.00 · Current $2500.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): The employer did not provide employees effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  (a)	Delta Cabinet Company, Inc., at 696 Industrial Blvd., Delta, CO 81416:  On and before November 4, 2021, the employer did not ensure that employees were provided effective training on hazardous chemicals such as, but not limited to:  (1)    Spray adhesives (2)    Solvent based paints (3)    Solvent based stains (4)    Various solvents   This condition exposed employees to chemical hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2500
  • — Z (S) $4144

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed through a written certification which included the requirements as outlined in 29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2):  (a)	Delta Cabinet Company, Inc., at 696 Industrial Blvd., Delta, CO 81416:  On and before November 4, 2021, the employer did not ensure through written verification that a workplace personal protective equipment (PPE) hazard assessment had been performed.  Abatement Note: The employer shall verify that the required workplace assessment has been performed through a written certification that shall include the following:      1)   Identifies the workplace evaluated;      2)   The person certifying that the evaluation has been performed;      3)   The date(s) that the hazard assessment was performed; and      4)   Which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.305 G01 IV A

Other-than-serious 10 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(1)(iv)(A): Flexible cords and cables were used as a substitute for the fixed wiring of a structure:  (a)	Delta Cabinet Company, Inc., at 696 Industrial Blvd., Delta, CO 81416:  On and before November 4, 2021, the employer did not ensure that flexible cords (extension cords) were not being used as a substitute for fixed wiring in that, extension cords were connected to permanent equipment in several locations of the production floor for the purpose of supplying electricity to, but not limited to, edge bander, slide saw, spray booth, counter top bender, and the solid surface counter top area. This condition exposed the employees to potential electrical hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345622807.