Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ALESSANDRO CAMPOS

Unprogrammed Other inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Other safety inspection of ALESSANDRO CAMPOS in LOT 79 SOPHIE DRIVE, FRANKFORD, DE 19945 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 345627285.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Alessandro Campos — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Alessandro Campos is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
ALESSANDRO CAMPOS
Site address
LOT 79 SOPHIE DRIVE
City
FRANKFORD
State
DE
ZIP
19945
Mailing
10730 SERENITY CIR, SEAFORD, DE 19973
Inspection type
Unprogrammed Other (I)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

14 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.178 L01 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 6, 2022
Abate by
Jun 2, 2022
Penalty
Initial $4,351 · Current $4,351
29 CFR  1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l):   a) Lot 79 Sophie Dr, Frankford, De 19945 (Northside): On or about November 8, 2021, the employer did not ensure that individuals operating  a Pettibone Rough Terrain Telescoping Forklift, Model 8044, were competent and trained in safe operations.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4351

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 6, 2022
Abate by
Jun 2, 2022
Penalty
Initial $3,729 · Current $3,729
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1):29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g), & (h) of this section for labels and other forms of warning, safety data sheets, and employee information and training will be met, and which also includes items (i) and (ii) of this subparagraph:  a) Lot 79 Sophie Dr, Frankford, De 19945 (Front): On or about November 8, 2021, The employer did not provide or maintain a hazardous communication program to include labels and other forms of warning, safety data sheets, and employee information and training as required.  ABATEMENT NOTE: A written program shall include description of how the criteria for the following will be met:  1. Labeling and other forms of warning; 2. Material Safety Data Sheets; 3. Employee information and training  Additionally, a list of hazardous chemicals known to be preset in the workplace must be compiled. Methods used to inform employees of the hazards associated with non-routine tasks and the informing of contractors of workplace hazards, including a description of the labeling system used in the facility and of the availability of material safety data sheets, must also be addressed. The written program must be made available upon request.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3729

1910.1200 E01 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 6, 2022
Abate by
Jun 2, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i): The employer did not compile a list of the hazardous chemicals known to be present using a product identifier that was referenced on the appropriate safety data sheet.  a) Lot 79 Sophie Dr, Frankford, De 19945 (Front): On or about November 8, 2021, the employer did not develop nor maintain a chemical inventory list identifying the hazardous chemicals being used by their employees.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 6, 2022
Abate by
Jun 2, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  a)Lot 79 Sophie Dr, Frankford, De 19945 (Front): On or about November 8, 2021, the employer did not provide training on hazardous chemicals to be used on the site nor did the employer provide SDS sheets for the employees to reference in case there was an exposure.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.50 D01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 6, 2022
Abate by
Jun 2, 2022
Penalty
Initial $4,351 · Current $4,351
29 CFR 1926.50(d)(1): First aid supplies were not accessible to the employees at the site:  a) Lot 79 Sophie Dr, Frankford, De 19945 (Front): On or about November 8, 2021, the employer did not provide first aid kit/supplies to the employees working at the site.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4351

1926.150 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 6, 2022
Abate by
Jun 2, 2022
Penalty
Initial $2,486 · Current $2,486
29 CFR  1926.150(a)(1):  The employer did not develop and maintain a fire protection program to be followed throughout all phases of construction and demolition work, and did not provide for the firefighting equipment as specified in this subpart:  a) Lot 79 Sophie Dr, Frankford, De 19945 (Front): On or about November 8, 2021, the employer did not provide any type of fire protection program to ensure that proper fire protection was addressed and the employees knew what to do in the event of a fire.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2486

1926.251 A02 III

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 6, 2022
Abate by
Jun 2, 2022
Penalty
Initial $4,351 · Current $4,351
29 CFR  1926.251(a)(2)(iii):The employer did not ensure the sling tag indicating the safe working load was present.  a) Lot 79 Sophie Dr., Frankford, De 19945 (south west): On or about November 8, 2021, The employer did not provide or maintain synthetic webbing that was labeled, tagged, or marked with the required labeling to identify the sling or its load capacity.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4351

1926.251 E01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 6, 2022
Abate by
Jun 2, 2022
Penalty
Initial $4,351 · Current $4,351
29 CFR  1926.251(e)(1):29 CFR 1926.251(e)(1):  The employer did not mark or code synthetic web slings as specified in 1926.251(e)(1)(i) through (e)(1)(iii) to show: (i) Name or trademark of manufacturer; (ii) Rated capacities for the type of hitch; or (iii) Type of material:  a) Lot 79 Sophie Dr., Frankford, De 19945 (south west): On or about November 8, 2021, The employer did not provide or maintain synthetic webbing that was labeled, tagged, or marked with the required labeling to identify the sling or its load capacity.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4351

1926.451 G01 VII

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 6, 2022
Penalty
Initial $4,351 · Current $4,351
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section.  a) Lot 79 Sophie Dr, Frankford, De 19945 (Northside): On or about November 8, 2021, the employer did not ensure that individuals working from an unapproved work platform on a Pettibone Rough Terrain Telescoping Forklift, Model 8044, were protected from fall hazards.  An employee was observed riding and working from an unapproved work platform while engaged in residential construction activities at heights of approximately 12 to 15 feet above grade without any means of fall protection.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4351

1926.602 A02 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 6, 2022
Abate by
Jun 2, 2022
Penalty
Initial $4,351 · Current $4,351
29 CFR  1926.602(a)(2)(i): Material handling equipment with rollover protective structures or adequate canopy protection was not provided with seat belts.  a) Lot 79 Sophie Dr, Frankford, De 19945 (Northside): On or about November 8, 2021, the employer did not ensure that employees operating a Pettibone Rough Terrain Telescoping Forklift, Model 8044, were protected from rollover hazards by providing an operating seat belt. An employee was observed operating the Pettibone Rough Terrain Telescoping Forklift, Model 8044 without a seatbelt.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4351

1926.602 C01 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 6, 2022
Abate by
Jun 2, 2022
Penalty
Initial $4,351 · Current $4,351
29 CFR  1926.602(c)(1)(i):Lifting and hauling equipment did not have the rated capacity clearly posted on the vehicle so as to be clearly visible to the operator:  a) Lot 79 Sophie Dr, Frankford, De 19945 (Northside): On or about November 8, 2021, the employer did not ensure that the rated capacity plate was visible for the operator to reference while using  the company owned Pettibone Rough Terrain Telescoping Forklift, Model 8044, while lifting building materials.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4351

1926.602 C01 VI

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 6, 2022
Abate by
Jun 2, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.602(c)(1)(vi):Industrial truck(s) in use did not meet the applicable requirements of design, construction, stability, inspection, testing, maintenance, and operation, as defined in American National Standards Institute B56.1-1969, Safety Standards for Powered Industrial Trucks.  a) Lot 79 Sophie Dr, Frankford, De 19945 (Northside): On or about November 8, 2021, the employer did not ensure that the Pettibone Rough Terrain Telescoping Forklift, Model 8044 was maintained to manufacturer's specifications.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.602 C01 VII

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 6, 2022
Abate by
Jun 2, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.602(c)(1)(vii):Unauthorized persons were allowed to ride on a powered industrial truck:  a) Lot 79 Sophie Dr, Frankford, De 19945 (Northside): On or about November 8, 2021, the employer did not ensure that individuals working from an unapproved work platform on a Pettibone Rough Terrain Telescoping Forklift, Model 8044, were protected from fall hazards.  An employee was observed riding and working from an unapproved work platform while engaged in residential construction activities at heights of approximately 12 to 15 feet above grade without any means of fall protection.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1060 A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 6, 2022
Abate by
Jun 2, 2022
Penalty
Initial $4,351 · Current $4,351
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize hazards related to ladders and stairways:  a) Lot 79 Sophie Dr, Frankford, De 19945 (Northside): On or about November 8, 2021, the employer failed to provide training on proper ladder use. Employees had erected a improperly setup ladder for access to the second level for use while conducting framing activities approximately 12 feet above grade by counting ladder rungs.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4351

View Alessandro Campos's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345627285.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.