LEAGUE CITY, TX —
OSHA Inspection: FRANCISCO FRIAS
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of FRANCISCO FRIAS in 1710 HARTFORD MILLS LANE, LEAGUE CITY, TX 77573 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 345629968.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- FRANCISCO FRIAS
- Site address
- 1710 HARTFORD MILLS LANE
- City
- LEAGUE CITY
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 77573
- Mailing
- 8701 BRANNON STREET, HOUSTON, TX 77093
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Dec 15, 2021
- Abate by
- Jan 12, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $2,341 · Current $1,405 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Employees did not use eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents: a) At the jobsite, employees were exposed to struck-by hazards while operating nail guns without wearing eye protection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1404.6
- — Z (S) $2341
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Dec 15, 2021
- Abate by
- Jan 12, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $4,096 · Current $2,458 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system: a) At the jobsite, employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 8-feet 5-inches to greater than 23-feet when they worked without using fall protection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2457.6
- — Z (S) $4096
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Dec 15, 2021
- Abate by
- Jan 12, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $2,926 · Current $1,756 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: a) At the jobsite, employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 8-feet 5-inches and greater when they used an aluminum extension ladder at the south side of the house without extending the ladder three feet above the landing. b) At the jobsite, employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 8-feet 5-inches and greater when they used an aluminum extension ladder at the northwest corner of the house without extending the ladder three feet above the landing. c) At the jobsite, employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 8-feet 5-inches and greater when they used an aluminum extension ladder at the entranceway of the house without extending the ladder three feet above the landing.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1755.6
- — Z (S) $2926
1926.1053 B05 I
- Issued
- Dec 15, 2021
- Abate by
- Jan 12, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $2,926 · Current $1,756 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(5)(i): Non-self-supporting ladders were not used at an angle such than the horizontal distance from the top support to the foot of the ladder way approximately one-quarter of the working length of the ladder (the distance along the ladder between the foot and the top support): a) At the jobsite, employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 8-feet 5-inches and greater when they used an aluminum extension ladder at the south side of the house with an unsafe angle. The horizontal distance from the top support to the foot of the ladder was approximately 5-feet 2-inches; the distance was required to be 2-feet 2-inches at this working height (one-quarter of the working length of the ladder). b) At the jobsite, employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 8-feet 5-inches and greater when they used an aluminum extension ladder at the south side of the house with an unsafe angle. The horizontal distance from the top support to the foot of the ladder was approximately 5-feet 4-inches; the distance was required to be 2-feet 2-inches at this working height (one-quarter of the working length of the ladder).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1755.6
- — Z (S) $2926
More inspections at Francisco Frias
View Francisco Frias's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345629968.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.