Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MILLSTONE MARBLE & GRINDSTONE, L.L.C.

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of MILLSTONE MARBLE & GRINDSTONE, L.L.C. in 7016 MILLSTONE DRIVE, NAVASOTA, TX 77868 (NAICS 327991). OSHA activity number 345638514.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Millstone Marble & Grindstone, L.L.C. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Millstone Marble & Grindstone, L.L.C. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
7016 MILLSTONE DRIVE
City
NAVASOTA
State
TX
ZIP
77868
Mailing
40801 WOODWAY STREET, MAGNOLIA, TX 77354
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
327991
Employees
8
Ownership type
A

12 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.1053 D01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 17, 2022
Abate by
Mar 16, 2022
Penalty
Initial $3,108 · Current $1,865 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.1053(d)(1):The employer did not assess the exposure of each employee who was or may reasonably be expected to be exposed to respirable crystalline silica at or above the action level in accordance with either the performance option in paragraph (d)(2) or the scheduled monitoring option in paragraph (d)(3) of this section:  On or about December 1, 2021, employees were exposed to respirable crystalline silica while cutting and grinding granite without the employer having assessed the exposure of each employee.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1864.8
  • — Z (S) $3108

1910.1053 F02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 17, 2022
Abate by
Mar 16, 2022
Penalty
Initial $3,108 · Current $1,865 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.1053(f)(2)(i):The employer did not establish and implement a written exposure control plan:  On or about December 1, 2021, employees were exposed to respirable crystalline silica while cutting and grinding granite when the employer did not have a written and implemented exposure control plan.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1864.8
  • — Z (S) $3108

1910.1053 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 17, 2022
Abate by
Mar 16, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.1053(h)(1): The employer allowed dry sweeping or dry brushing where such activity could contribute to employee exposure to respirable crystalline silica and wet sweeping, HEPA-filtered vacuuming or other methods that minimize the likelihood of exposure were feasible:   On or about December 1, 2021, employees were exposed to respirable crystalline silica when they dry swept the shop floor to remove dust from cutting and grinding granite.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1053 H02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 17, 2022
Abate by
Mar 16, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.1053(h)(2)(i): The employer allowed compressed air to be used to clean clothing or surfaces where such activity could contribute to employee exposure to respirable crystalline silica without being used in conjunction with a ventilation system to capture blown dust:   On or about December 1, 2021, employees were exposed to respirable crystalline silica when fabricating granite countertops when the employees used compressed air to clean the granite of debris.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1053 G02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 17, 2022
Abate by
Mar 16, 2022
Penalty
Initial $3,108 · Current $1,865 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.1053(g)(2): Where respirator use was required by this section, the employer did not institute a respiratory protection program in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.134:   On or about December 1, 2021, in the�shop area,�employees were�exposed to�respiratory hazards�while wearing filtering�facepiece respirators�while cutting, grinding, and polishing granite without the�employer having�a�written respiratory�protection program.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1864.8
  • — Z (S) $3108

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 17, 2022
Abate by
Mar 16, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(c)(1):A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  On or about December 1, 2021, in the�shop area,�employees were�exposed to�respiratory hazards�while wearing filtering�facepiece respirators�while cutting, grinding, and polishing granite without the�employer having�a�written respiratory�protection program.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 17, 2022
Abate by
Mar 16, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:   On or about December 1, 2021, in the�shop area,�employees were�exposed to respiratory�hazards while�wearing�filtering facepiece�respirators without�having been�medically evaluated.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 17, 2022
Abate by
Mar 16, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator:  On or about December 1, 2021, in the�shop area,�employees were�exposed to respiratory�hazards while�wearing�filtering facepiece�respirators without�having been fit tested.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 G01 I A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 17, 2022
Abate by
Mar 16, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A): Respirators with tight-fitting facepieces were worn by employees who had facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or that interfered with valve function:   On or about December 1, 2021, an employee was required to wear a tight fitting 3M brand half-face respirators without having his facial hair trimmed or shaven so that the facial hair did not interfere with the face mask sealing surface.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1053 I01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 17, 2022
Abate by
Mar 16, 2022
Penalty
Initial $3,108 · Current $1,865 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.1053(i)(1)(i): The employer did not make medical surveillance available at no cost to each employee, and at a reasonable time and place, for each employee who has been occupationally exposed to respirable crystalline silica at or above the action level for 30 or more days per year:   On or about December 1, 2021, medical surveillance had not been made available for employees that were exposed to respirable crystalline silica while cutting and grinding granite.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1864.8
  • — Z (S) $3108

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 17, 2022
Abate by
Mar 16, 2022
Penalty
Initial $3,108 · Current $1,865 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.1200(e)(1):The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  On or about December 1, 2021, in the shop, employees were exposed to chemicals while working with or around hazardous chemicals, such as but not limited to, Superior Gold GV-5 Knife Grade Adhesive, Agar Tiger Color Enhancer, and silica, before effective information and training on the chemicals had been provided.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1864.8
  • — Z (S) $3108

1910.1200 G01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 17, 2022
Abate by
Mar 16, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.1200(g)(1):  Employer did not have a safety data sheet in the workplace for each hazardous chemical which they use   On or about December 1, 2021, in the shop, employees were exposed to chemicals while working with or around hazardous chemicals, such as but not limited to, Superior Gold GV-5 Knife Grade Adhesive, Agar Tiger Color Enhancer, and respirable crystalline silica dust, without having their safety data sheets available in the workplace.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345638514.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.