GALVESTON, TX —
OSHA Inspection: ROMUNLO COLMENERO
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ROMUNLO COLMENERO in 6302 SEAWALL BLVD, GALVESTON, TX 77551 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 345643761.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ROMUNLO COLMENERO
- Site address
- 6302 SEAWALL BLVD
- City
- GALVESTON
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 77551
- Mailing
- 9302 SANDRA ST., HOUSTON, TX 77016
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 11
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Mar 29, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $2,113 · Current $2,113
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: a) At the jobsite, employees were conducting roofing work and employees working below them were not wearing head protection, exposing employees to the hazard of head injuries.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2113
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Mar 29, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Employees did not use eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents: a) At the jobsite, employees conducting roofing work were not wearing eye protection, exposing employees to the hazard of eye injuries.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.501 B10
- Issued
- Mar 29, 2022
- Abate by
- Apr 5, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $5,801 · Current $5,801
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10): Each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs, with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels, was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems or a combination of warning line system and safety monitoring system. a) At the jobsite, employees were conducting roofing work were not protected from falls greater than 6 feet.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $5801
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Mar 29, 2022
- Abate by
- Apr 15, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee who was exposed to fall hazards that enabled each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and did not train each employee in the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: a) At the jobsite, the employer did not provide training for employees performing roofing activities, exposing the employees to a fall hazard of approximately 45 feet.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.602 C01 II
- Issued
- Mar 29, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $2,113 · Current $2,113
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.602(c)(1)(ii):29 CFR 1926.602(c)(1)(ii): Modifications or additions affecting the safe operation of the equipment were made without the manufacturer's written approval: a) At the jobsite, a JCP Rough Terrain Forklift was modified by the addition of a job-made wooden trash box, exposing employees to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2113
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Mar 29, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $2,113 · Current $2,113
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to upper landing surfaces, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladders were used to gain access: a) At the jobsite, employees used two 24-foot extension ladders to gain access to the rooftop and the ladder were not extended three feet about the landing, exposing the employees to a fall hazard of approximately 20 feet.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2113
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345643761.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.