SOUTH EUCLID, OH —
OSHA Inspection: AEROCONTROLEX
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of AEROCONTROLEX in 4223 MONTICELLO BOULEVARD, SOUTH EUCLID, OH 44121 (NAICS 336413). OSHA activity number 345646160.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- AEROCONTROLEX
- Site address
- 4223 MONTICELLO BOULEVARD
- City
- SOUTH EUCLID
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 44121
- Mailing
- 4223 MONTICELLO BOULEVARD, SOUTH EUCLID, OH 44121
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 336413
- Employees
- 97
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.147 C04 I
- Issued
- Jan 19, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $10,151 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section: On or about November 11, 2021, the employer did not ensure procedures for the safe application, usage, and removal of potentially hazardous energy controls were developed, documented, and/or, utilized during die set up on a hydraulic Cunningham Manufacturing Co. "C" style press, S/N 91597-214 with a 6" bore, 3" piston with ?' stroke. The presses contained both electrical and hydraulic stored energy.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $10151
1910.147 D
- Issued
- Jan 19, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(d): The established procedure for the application of energy control (the lockout or tagout procedures) did not cover the actions listed in and was not done in sequence as required by 29 CFR 1910.147(d)(1)-(6): On or about November 11, 2021, the employer did not ensure an established procedure was followed for the application of energy controls (lockout/tagout) and were done in sequence during die set up on a hydraulic Cunningham Manufacturing Co. "C" style press, S/N 91597-214 with a 6" bore, 3" piston with ?' stroke. Employees did not apply energy controls by; turning off and/or shutting down the "C" style hydraulic swage presses [per the 1910.147(d)(2) requirements], isolating all energy sources [(d)(3)], affixing a lockout device to the energy isolating device [(d)(4)], and verify the equipment energy was isolated and de-energized prior to starting work [(d)(6)].
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.147 C07 I
- Issued
- Jan 19, 2022
- Abate by
- Feb 8, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $10,151 · Current $7,613 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i): The employer did not provide adequate training to ensure that the purpose and function of the energy control program was understood by employees: On or about November 11, 2021, the employer failed to provide training to ensure affected and authorized employees understood the purpose and function of the energy control program and employees had acquired the knowledge and skills required for the safe application, usage, and removal of energy controls. The employer engages in the service and maintenance activities on machinery and equipment including, but not limited too; hydraulic power presses with both electrical and hydraulic stored energy.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $7613
- — Z (S) $10151
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Jan 19, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $10,151 · Current $7,613 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks: On or about November 11, 2021, the employer did not ensure one or more methods of machine guarding were provided to protect the operator and other employees working at the machine from the hazards created by the point of operation and flying parts of dies on a hydraulic Cunningham Manufacturing Co. "C" style press, S/N 91597-214 with a 6" bore, 3" piston with ?' stroke.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $7613
- — Z (S) $10151
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 336413)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345646160.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.