PASSAIC, NJ —
OSHA Inspection: CUZCO GENERAL CONTRACTOR INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of CUZCO GENERAL CONTRACTOR INC. in 242 BOULEVARD, PASSAIC, NJ 07055 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 345647374.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- CUZCO GENERAL CONTRACTOR INC.
- Site address
- 242 BOULEVARD
- City
- PASSAIC
- State
- NJ
- ZIP
- 07055
- Mailing
- 2 COURLAND TRAIL, MAHWAH, NJ 07430
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- May 13, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $3,729 · Current $2,429 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury: A) Exterior, Roof Level of house: Employees were exposed to eye/face injuries while using pneumatic nail guns and were not protected with any type of eye/face protection, on or about 11/18/21.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2428.85
- — Z (S) $3729
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- May 13, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $4,351 · Current $2,828 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph (b) A) Exterior, Roof of the house: Employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 28 feet while engaged in roofing work on the roof of a house without a means of fall protection in place, on or about 11/18/21.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2828.15
- — Z (S) $4351
1926.502 D15 II
- Issued
- May 13, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $4,351 · Current $2,828 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(15)(ii): Anchorages points were not installed under the supervision of a qualified person. a) Building Exterior-Roof: An employee was exposed to a fall hazard, while engaged in roofing activities and the anchorage point was not installed under the supervision of a qualified person, on or about 11/18/21.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2828.15
- — Z (S) $4351
1926.502 D
- Issued
- May 13, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $4,351 · Current $2,828 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d): "Personal fall arrest systems." Personal fall arrest systems and their use shall comply with the provisions set forth below. Effective January 1, 1998, body belts are not acceptable as part of a personal fall arrest system. Note: The use of a body belt in a positioning device system is acceptable and is regulated under paragraph (e) of this section. A) Building Exterior Roof: Personal fall arrest systems did not comply with the provisions as required. Employee was tied around his waist with a vertical life line as part of a personal fall arrest system, on or about 11/18/21. -
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2828.15
- — Z (S) $4351
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- May 13, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $4,351 · Current $2,828 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: A) Exterior, Roof of the structure: Employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 28 feet while using an extension ladder that was not extended at least 3 feet over the landing that they were accessing, on or about 11/18/21
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2828.15
- — Z (S) $4351
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in NJ
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345647374.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.