WHARTON, NJ —
OSHA Inspection: STAFFING VISIONARIES INC.
Unprogrammed Related inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Related health inspection of STAFFING VISIONARIES INC. in 92 N. MAIN ST., WHARTON, NJ 07885 (NAICS 561320). OSHA activity number 345655153.
What this inspection record means
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Watch Staffing Visionaries INC. — free
Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Staffing Visionaries INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- STAFFING VISIONARIES INC.
- Site address
- 92 N. MAIN ST.
- City
- WHARTON
- State
- NJ
- ZIP
- 07885
- Mailing
- 80 BROADWAY SUITE 1A, PASSAIC, NJ 07055
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Unprogrammed Related (G)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 561320
- Employees
- 30
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.95 K03 I
- Issued
- May 19, 2022
- Abate by
- Jun 13, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $10,360 · Current $6,000 Reduced
81108111
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(k)(3)(i): The employer did not ensure that each employee was informed of the effects of noise on hearing: Workplace, 92 N. Main St., Wharton, NJ a) An employee working in the Production Area including Production Line 2 was exposed to continuous noise levels of 122.9 % of the Permissible Action Level Exposure Limit ( 8 hour Time Weighted Average sound level of 85 dBA .) The extended work shift Action Level for employees who work 11.7 hours is 84.25 dBA. The equivalent sound level of the measured dose is 91.4 dBA. Sampling was performed for 702 minutes on 3/31/22 to 4/1/22. This employee has been working in the Production Area since March 16, 2022. This employee was not informed of the effects of noise on hearing. b) An employee working in the Production Area including Production Line 5 was exposed to continuous noise levels of 187.7 % of the Permissible Action Level Exposure Limit ( 8 hour Time Weighted Average sound level of 85 dBA .) The extended work shift Action Level for employees who work 11.7 hours is 84.25 dBA. The equivalent sound level of the measured dose is 94.54 dBA. Sampling was performed for 706 minutes on 3/31/22 to 4/1/22. This employee has been working in the Production Area since March 9, 2022. This employee was not informed of the effects of noise on hearing. c) An employee working in the Production Area including Production Line 6 was exposed to continuous noise levels of 154.4 % of the Permissible Action Level Exposure Limit ( 8 hour Time Weighted Average sound level of 85 dBA .) The extended work shift Action Level for employees who work 11.62 hours is 84.31 dBA. The equivalent sound level of the measured dose is 93.13 dBA. Sampling was performed for 697 minutes on 3/31/22 to 4/1/22. This employee has been working in the Production Area since March 16, 2022. This employee was not informed of the effects of noise on hearing. Violation occurred from March 9, 2022 to the present.
Recent events (3)
- — C (S) $10360
- — F (S) $6000
- — Z (S) $10360
1910.95 K03 II
- Issued
- May 19, 2022
- Abate by
- Jun 13, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
81108111
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(k)(3)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each employee was informed of the purpose of hearing protectors, the advantages, disadvantages, and attenuation of various types, and instructions on selection, fitting, use and care: Workplace, 92 N. Main St., Wharton, NJ a) An employee working in the Production Area including Production Line 2 was exposed to continuous noise levels of 122.9 % of the Permissible Action Level Exposure Limit ( 8 hour Time Weighted Average sound level of 85 dBA .) The extended work shift Action Level for employees who work 11.7 hours is 84.25 dBA. The equivalent sound level of the measured dose is 91.4 dBA. Sampling was performed for 702 minutes on 3/31/22 to 4/1/22. This employee has been working in the Production Area since March 16, 2022. This employee was not informed of the advantages and disadvantages of various types, and instruction on selection, fitting, use and care of hearing protectors. b) An employee working in the Production Area including Production Line 5 was exposed to continuous noise levels of 187.7 % of the Permissible Action Level Exposure Limit ( 8 hour Time Weighted Average sound level of 85 dBA .) The extended work shift Action Level for employees who work 11.7 hours is 84.25 dBA. The equivalent sound level of the measured dose is 94.54 dBA. Sampling was performed for 706 minutes on 3/31/22 to 4/1/22. This employee has been working in the Production Area since March 9, 2022. This employee was not informed of the advantages and disadvantages of various types, and instruction on selection, fitting, use and care of hearing protectors. c) An employee working in the Production Area including Production Line 6 was exposed to continuous noise levels of 154.4 % of the Permissible Action Level Exposure Limit ( 8 hour Time Weighted Average sound level of 85 dBA .) The extended work shift Action Level for employees who work 11.62 hours is 84.31 dBA. The equivalent sound level of the measured dose is 93.13 dBA. Sampling was performed for 697 minutes on 3/31/22 to 4/1/22. This employee has been working in the Production Area since March 16, 2022. This employee was not informed of the advantages and disadvantages of various types, and instruction on selection, fitting, use and care of hearing protectors. Violation occurred from March 9, 2022 to the present.
Recent events (3)
- — C (S) $0
- — F (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.95 K03 III
- Issued
- May 19, 2022
- Abate by
- Jun 13, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
81108111
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(k)(3)(iii): The employer did not ensure that each employee was informed of the purpose of audiometric testing, and an explanation of the test procedures: Workplace, 92 N. Main St., Wharton, NJ a) An employee working in the Production Area including Production Line 2 was exposed to continuous noise levels of 122.9 % of the Permissible Action Level Exposure Limit ( 8 hour Time Weighted Average sound level of 85 dBA .) The extended work shift Action Level for employees who work 11.7 hours is 84.25 dBA. The equivalent sound level of the measured dose is 91.4 dBA. Sampling was performed for 702 minutes on 3/31/22 to 4/1/22. This employee has been working in the Production Area since March 16, 2022. This employee was not informed of the purpose of audiometric testing, and an explanation of the test procedures. b) An employee working in the Production Area including Production Line 5 was exposed to continuous noise levels of 187.7 % of the Permissible Action Level Exposure Limit ( 8 hour Time Weighted Average sound level of 85 dBA .) The extended work shift Action Level for employees who work 11.7 hours is 84.25 dBA. The equivalent sound level of the measured dose is 94.54 dBA. Sampling was performed for 706 minutes on 3/31/22 to 4/1/22. This employee has been working in the Production Area since March 9, 2022. This employee was not informed of the purpose of audiometric testing, and an explanation of the test procedures. c) An employee working in the Production Area including Production Line 6 was exposed to continuous noise levels of 154.4 % of the Permissible Action Level Exposure Limit ( 8 hour Time Weighted Average sound level of 85 dBA .) The extended work shift Action Level for employees who work 11.62 hours is 84.31 dBA. The equivalent sound level of the measured dose is 93.13 dBA. Sampling was performed for 697 minutes on 3/31/22 to 4/1/22. This employee has been working in the Production Area since March 16, 2022. This employee was not informed of the purpose of audiometric testing, and an explanation of the test procedures. Violation occurred from March 9, 2022 to the present.
Recent events (3)
- — C (S) $0
- — F (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at Staffing Visionaries INC.
View Staffing Visionaries INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 561320)
Jul 17, 2026
Impellam Group DBA Ford Racing · LIVONIA, MI
Jul 16, 2026
Premier Staffing Solution · RICHMOND, VA
Jul 15, 2026
Aerotek · CLEAR LAKE, SD
Jul 14, 2026
WA317992054 - Finn Madden INC · RENTON, WA
Jul 13, 2026
Management Registry, INC. · MEMPHIS, TN
More inspections in NJ
Jul 17, 2026
East Orange Community Charter School · EAST ORANGE, NJ
Jul 17, 2026
East Orange Community Charter School · EAST ORANGE, NJ
Jul 17, 2026
East Orange Community Charter School · EAST ORANGE, NJ
Jul 17, 2026
John Caruso Builders LLC · MOUNTAIN LAKES, NJ
Jul 16, 2026
Borough of Pennington Department of Public Works · PENNINGTON, NJ
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345655153.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.