GLOVERSVILLE, NY —
OSHA Inspection: 4X HEAVEN
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of 4X HEAVEN in 221 WEST FULTON STREET, GLOVERSVILLE, NY 12078 (NAICS 811111). OSHA activity number 345670962.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- 4X HEAVEN
- Site address
- 221 WEST FULTON STREET
- City
- GLOVERSVILLE
- State
- NY
- ZIP
- 12078
- Mailing
- 221 WEST FULTON STREET, GLOVERSVILLE, NY 12078
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 811111
- Employees
- 7
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Mar 21, 2022
- Abate by
- Apr 25, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $2,486 · Current $1,865 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): In the workplace where respirators were necessary to protect the health of the employee or where respirators were required by the employer, the employer did not establish and implement a written respiratory protection program with worksite-specific procedures including the provisions (i)-(ix) of this section, as applicable: (a) On and before 12/2/2021, in the spraying area, for the sprayers required to wear a 3M P95 and a Miller half-face respirator with P100 cartridges while spraying vehicles with Rust Protection and Lubricant containing chemicals, such as, but not limited to, Barium di(benzenesulphonate). The employer did not implement a worksite-specific respiratory protection program. Abatement Note: The Respiratory Protection Program shall include the following sections: (1) Procedures for selecting respirators for use in the workplace; (2) Medical evaluations of employees required to use respirators; (3) Fit testing procedures for tight-fitting respirators; (4) Procedures for proper use of respirators in routine and reasonably foreseeable emergency situations; (5) Procedures and schedules for cleaning, disinfecting, storing, inspecting, repairing, discarding, and otherwise maintaining respirators; (6) Procedures to ensure adequate air quality, quantity, and flow of breathing air for atmosphere- supplying respirators (if used); (7) Training of employees in the respiratory hazards to which they are potentially exposed during routine and emergency situations; (8) Training of employees in the proper use of respirators, including putting on and removing them, any limitations on their use, and their maintenance; and (9) Procedures for regularly evaluating the effectiveness of the program.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1864.5
- — Z (S) $2486
1910.134 D03 II
- Issued
- Mar 21, 2022
- Abate by
- Mar 25, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(3)(ii): The employer did not provide a respirator that was appropriate for the chemical state and physical form of the contaminant: (a) On and before 12/2/2021, in the spraying area, for the sprayers wearing a 3M P95 and a Miller half-face respirator with P100 cartridges while spraying vehicles with Rust Protection and Lubricant containing chemicals, such as, but not limited to, Barium di(benzenesulphonate). The employees were not provided with a combo organic vapor/P100 cartridge prior to being required to wear the respirator.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Mar 21, 2022
- Abate by
- Apr 8, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee is fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: (a) On and before 12/2/2021, in the spraying area, for the sprayers wearing a 3M P95 and a Miller half-face respirator with P100 cartridges while spraying vehicles with Rust Protection and Lubricant containing chemicals, such as, but not limited to, Barium di(benzenesulphonate). The employee was not provided a medical evaluation prior to being required to wear the respirator.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Mar 21, 2022
- Abate by
- Apr 25, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $1,865 · Current $1,399 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employer did not develop, implement, and maintain at each workplace, a written hazard communication program which at least describes how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g), and (h) of this section for labels and other forms of warning, material safety data sheets, and employee information and training will be met, and which also includes the following: (a) On and before 12/2/2021, in the spraying area, for the sprayers spraying vehicles with Rust Protection and Lubricant containing chemicals, such as, but not limited to, Barium di(benzenesulphonate). Employer did not develop a hazard communication program.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1398.75
- — Z (S) $1865
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Mar 21, 2022
- Abate by
- Apr 25, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: (a) On and before 12/2/2021, in the spraying area, for the sprayers spraying vehicles with Rust Protection and Lubricant containing chemicals, such as, but not limited to, Barium di(benzenesulphonate). Training was not provided to employees regarding chemical hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- Mar 21, 2022
- Abate by
- Apr 8, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): The employer did not ensure that employees using tight fitting face piece respirators pass an appropriate qualitative or quantitative fit test prior to initial use of the respirator, whenever a different respirator facepiece (size, style, model or make) is used, and at least annually thereafter. (a) On and before 12/2/2021, in the spraying area, for the sprayers wearing a 3M P95 and a Miller half-face respirator with P100 cartridges while spraying vehicles with Rust Protection and Lubricant containing chemicals, such as, but not limited to, Barium di(benzenesulphonate). The employees were not fit tested, either qualitatively or quantitatively, prior to being required to use this respirator by the employer.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at 4X Heaven
View 4X Heaven's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 811111)
More inspections in NY
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345670962.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.