Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ROOF SYSTEMS OF MAINE, A TECTA AMERICA COMPANY, LLC

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of ROOF SYSTEMS OF MAINE, A TECTA AMERICA COMPANY, LLC in HERMON HIGH SCHOOL 2414 US RT 2, HERMON, ME 04401 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 345674030.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Roof Systems of Maine, a Tecta America Company, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Roof Systems of Maine, a Tecta America Company, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
HERMON HIGH SCHOOL 2414 US RT 2
City
HERMON
State
ME
ZIP
04401
Mailing
332 TARGET INDUSTRIAL CIRCLE, BANGOR, ME 04401
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
30
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.150 C01 VIII

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Apr 20, 2022
Abate by
Apr 28, 2022
Penalty
Initial $7,252 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.150(c)(1)(viii): Portable fire extinguishers were not inspected periodically in accordance with maintenance and use of portable fire extinguishers, N.F.P.A. No. 10A-1970:  Roof - In the following instances, Class ABC fire extinguishers had not been subjected to a monthly inspection in accordance with NFPA 10-1970:  a)  Kidde 15-pound extinguisher b)  Badger 20-pound extinguisher c)  Ansul 15-pound extinguisher
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $7252

1926.501 B10

Other-than-serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 20, 2022
Penalty
Initial $10,151 · Current $27,408
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(10): Each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet or more above lower levels, was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or a combination of warning line system and guardrail system, warning line system and safety net system, or warning line system and personal fall arrest system, or warning line system and safety monitoring system:  Roof - On or about 12/7/21, an employee, performing roofing activities in an area where the warning line system was removed and the monitor could not effectively watch the employee, was not protected from falling by a guardrail system, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $27407.7
  • — Z (S) $10151

1926.502 F01

Other-than-serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 20, 2022
Penalty
Initial $10,151 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.502(f)(1): Warning lines were not erected around all sides of the roof work area:  Roof - On or about 12/7/21, the warning lines were not erected in the area where  an employee fell.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $10151

1926.502 F02 II

Other-than-serious Gravity 5 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 20, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.502(f)(2)(ii): The rope, wire, or chain was not rigged or supported in such a way that its lowest point (including sag) was not less than 34 inches (0.9 m) from the walking/working surface and its highest point no more than 39 inches (1.0 m) from the walking/working surface:  Roof - On or about 12/7/21, the warning line sagged to a low of 28 inches on the west  side and 31 inches on the north side, from the roof surface.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.502 H01 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 20, 2022
Penalty
Initial $10,151 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.502(h)(1)(ii): The safety monitor did not warn employees when it appeared the employee was unaware of a fall hazard or was acting in an unsafe manner:   Roof - On or about 12/7/21, the safety monitor did not warn the employee before they backed toward and off the edge of the roof.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $10151

1926.502 H01 V

Other-than-serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Apr 20, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.502(h)(1)(v): The safety monitor had other responsibilities which could take the monitor's attention from the monitoring function:  Roof - On or about 12/7/21, the safety monitor was assigned to watch two sets of employees who were working ninety degrees from one another and over fifty feet apart.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345674030.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.