BEACON, NY —
OSHA Inspection: KENNY'S RENOVATIONS INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of KENNY'S RENOVATIONS INC. in 92 OLD GLENHAM RD., BEACON, NY 12508 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 345677975.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- KENNY'S RENOVATIONS INC.
- Site address
- 92 OLD GLENHAM RD.
- City
- BEACON
- State
- NY
- ZIP
- 12508
- Mailing
- 6 GRANT ST., MIDDLETOWN, NY 10940
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 7
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $4351.00 · Current $4351.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee who was exposed to fall hazards: Location: entire site On or about: 10/6/21 a) Employees, exposed to a fall hazard while engaged in roofing and carpentry work, were not provided with fall protection training. NOTE: The employer is required to submit abatement certification for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (3)
- — J (S) $4351
- — C (S) $4351
- — Z (S) $4351
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $29005.00 · Current $29005.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems: Location: roof On or about: 10/6/21 a) Employees, engaged in residential roofing and carpentry, were not using any means of fall protection. The employees were exposed to a fall between 16 and 19 feet. NOTE: Because abatement of this violation is already documented in the inspection casefile, the employer need not submit certification or documentation of abatement for this violation as normally required by 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (3)
- — J (W) $29005
- — C (W) $29005
- — Z (W) $29005
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
FAIRVIEW, TN—2026-07-16
MARVIN PINERA
CARSON CITY, NV—2026-07-16
UNKNOWN/INVALID ESTABLISHMENT
BANNOCKBURN, IL—2026-07-16
ROOFING H.P. LLC
LOXLEY, AL—2026-07-16
CARLOS CHE
BALTIMORE, MD—2026-07-16
VAL CONSTRUCTION INC
More inspections in NY
MAYVILLE, NY—2026-07-16
MAYVILLE VILLAGE DPW
NEW HYDE PARK, NY—2026-07-16
NORTH HEMPSTEAD TN MICHAEL J TULLY PARK
CONESUS, NY—2026-07-16
CONESUS TN HIGHWAY DEPT
COMSTOCK, NY—2026-07-15
NYSDOCCS WASHINGTON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
BALDWINSVILLE, NY—2026-07-15
LYSANDER TOWN HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345677975.