Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ARMANDO PINEDA

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ARMANDO PINEDA in 881 N. TARRANT PKWY., KELLER, TX 76248 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 345678213.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Armando Pineda — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Armando Pineda is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
ARMANDO PINEDA
Site address
881 N. TARRANT PKWY.
City
KELLER
State
TX
ZIP
76248
Mailing
2544 BAHAMA DR. APT. 118, DALLAS, TX 75211
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 9, 2021
Penalty
Initial $1,492 · Current $1,492
29 CFR  1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:  On or about December 9, 2021, at a commercial jobsite, an employee worked without head protection on the ground below roofing employees working from above. The employee was exposed to overhead struck-by hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1492

1926.501 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 9, 2021
Penalty
Initial $2,487 · Current $2,487
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(1):"Unprotected sides and edges." Each employee on a walking/working surface (horizontal and vertical surface) with an unprotected side or edge which is 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level shall be protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems.  On or about December 9, 2021, and at times prior thereto, at a commercial roofing jobsite, the employer did not provide employees with fall protection. Roofing employees were exposed to fall hazards greater than six feet to the ground and concrete below.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2487

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 9, 2021
Penalty
Initial $1,755 · Current $1,755
29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(1):Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:  On or about December 9, 2021, and at times prior thereto, at a commercial roofing jobsite, the employer did not ensure the ladder used to access and egress the roof extended three feet above the roofs edge.  Employees were exposed to fall hazards to the ground and concrete below.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1755

1926.503 B01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 9, 2021
Abate by
Jan 10, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.503(b)(1): The employer did not verify fall protection training by preparing a written certification record.   On or about December 9, 2021, and at times prior thereto, at a commercial roofing jobsite, the employer did not provide employees with fall training and certification of training where employees were exposed to fall hazards while working over 6 feet.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1926.503 C

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 9, 2021
Abate by
Jan 10, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.503(c): The employer did not retrain affected employees  who already had been trained but demonstrated inadequate  understanding and skill required by paragraph (a) of this section:   Note:  Circumstances where retraining is required include, but are not limited to, situations where (1) Changes in the workplace render previous training obsolete; or (2) Changes in the types of fall protection systems or equipment to be used render previous training obsolete; or (3) changes in the type of fall protection systems or equipment to be used; or (4) Inadequacies in an affected employees knowledge or use of fall protection systems or equipment indicate that the employee has not retained the requisite understanding or skill:   On or about December 9, 2021, and at times prior thereto, at a commercial roofing jobsite, the employees understood and retained the knowledge and or skills to prevent fall hazard and exposure to fall hazards where the employees were working over 6 feet and exposed to fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1926.1060 A01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 9, 2021
Abate by
Jan 10, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.1060(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders as necessary, enabling each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards.   On or about December 9, 2021, and at times prior thereto, at a commercial roofing jobsite, the employer did not ensure the employees were provided ladder safety program to understand and avoid ladder hazards and fall hazards when used to access and egress the roof extended three feet above the roofs edge.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

View Armando Pineda's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345678213.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.