Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,198,201Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-31 Last loaded 2026-09-03

OSHA Inspection: DAYLITER RENTALS, LLC

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of DAYLITER RENTALS, LLC in 210 KANSAS CITY AVE., SHREVEPORT, LA 71107 (NAICS 532412). OSHA activity number 345681571.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Dayliter Rentals, LLC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Dayliter Rentals, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
210 KANSAS CITY AVE.
City
SHREVEPORT
State
LA
ZIP
71107
Mailing
210 KANSAS CITY AVE., SHREVEPORT, LA 71107
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
532412
Employees
89
Ownership type
Private (A)

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 E01

Other-than-serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 28, 2022
Penalty
Initial $4,931 · Current $4,931
29 CFR  1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  a) Shop: On or about December 14, 2021, employees were required to wear 3M 6800 full facepiece elastomeric negative-pressure respirators without a medical evaluation.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $4931
  • · Z (S) $4931

1910.134 F02

Other-than-serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 28, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator:  a) Shop: On or about December 14, 2021, employees were required to wear 3M 6800 full facepiece elastomeric negative-pressure respirators without initial fit testing.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.134 D01 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 28, 2022
Abate by
Feb 24, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminant's chemical state and physical form:  a) Shop: On or about December 15, 2021, and times prior thereto, employees sprayed UL XT 9512 that contained hazardous chemicals, such as (but not limited to) 4-4'-methylenediphenyl diisocyanate, where the employer did not have a reasonable estimate of exposure.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 345681571.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.