BRIDGEPORT, CT —
OSHA Inspection: CANTINA HOSPITALITY LLC
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of CANTINA HOSPITALITY LLC in 308 LINDLEY ST (NORTH AVE), BRIDGEPORT, CT 06606 (NAICS 722513). OSHA activity number 345701361.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- CANTINA HOSPITALITY LLC
- Site address
- 308 LINDLEY ST (NORTH AVE)
- City
- BRIDGEPORT
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06606
- Mailing
- 3379 PEACHTREE ROAD, NE SUITE 360, ATLANTA, GA 30326
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 722513
- Employees
- 25
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.132 F01 IV
- Issued
- Feb 18, 2022
- Abate by
- Apr 7, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $11,188 · Current $2,797 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(f)(1)(iv):Employee(s) required to use PPE by this section were not trained to know the limitations of PPE: Facility: The employees required to use the Tucker long gloves and the black Pro Guard gloves were not trained on the limitations of the gloves.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $2797
- — C (S) $11188
- — Z (S) $11188
1910.138 B
- Issued
- Feb 18, 2022
- Abate by
- Apr 7, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $11,188 · Current $2,797 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.138(b):The employer did not base selection of appropriate hand protection on an evaluation of the performance characteristics of the hand protection relative to the tasks to be performed, conditions present, duration of use, and the hazards and potential hazards identified: Facility: The Tucker long black gloves and the black Pro Guard gloves were not appropriate to perform tasks such as, but not limited to, retrieving products that were submerged in the Rethermalizer.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $2797
- — C (S) $11188
- — Z (S) $11188
1904.39 A02
- Issued
- Feb 18, 2022
- Abate by
- Apr 7, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $5,000 · Current $1,250 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.39(a)(2):The employer did not report within 24-hours a work-related incident resulting in an in-patient hospitalization, amputation or the loss of an eye. 308 Lindley St, Bridgeport, CT: On/about August 29, 2021, an employee suffered second-degree burns to the right forearm while performing food panning and was hospitalized; the employer did not report the hospitalization to OSHA within twenty-four (24) hours.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $1250
- — C (O) $5000
- — Z (O) $5000
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 722513)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345701361.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.