NEW HAVEN, CT —
OSHA Inspection: BEAUDOIN, INC.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of BEAUDOIN, INC. in 98 OLIVE STREET, NEW HAVEN, CT 06511 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 345706949.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- BEAUDOIN, INC.
- Site address
- 98 OLIVE STREET
- City
- NEW HAVEN
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06511
- Mailing
- 21 HEMINGWAY DRIVE, WALLINGFORD, CT 06492
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.503 B01
- Issued
- Feb 18, 2022
- Abate by
- Mar 31, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $2,051 · Current $1,436 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1):The employer shall verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written certification record. The written certification record shall contain the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer. If the employer relies on training conducted by another employer or completed prior to the effective date of this section, the certification record shall indicate the date the employer determined the prior training was adequate rather than the date of actual training. Jobsite: The employer did not maintain a written certification record of employees who were trained in fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1435.7
- — Z (S) $2051
1926.701 B
- Issued
- Feb 18, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $4,102 · Current $2,871 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.701(b): All protruding reinforcing steel, onto and/or into which employees could fall, was not guarded to eliminate the hazard of impalement: Jobsite: The employer did not ensure that the reinforcing steel bars that were protruding from the concrete below where employees could fall were guarded to prevent the hazard of impalement.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2871.4
- — Z (S) $4102
1926.501 B01
- Issued
- Feb 18, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $6,838 · Current $4,787 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems. Jobsite: The employer did not ensure that the employees who were required to work from the second-floor deck of the residential building under construction were provided with fall protection by the use of adequate guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems. Beaudoin, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1494565, citation number1, item number 2a and was affirmed as a final order on 08 December 2020, with respect to a workplace located at 427 Howe Avenue, Shelton, CT 06484.
Recent events (2)
- — I (R) $4786.6
- — Z (R) $6838
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Feb 18, 2022
- Abate by
- Mar 31, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $5,469 · Current $3,828 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: Jobsite: The employer did not ensure that the employees who were required to work from the deck of the building under construction at a height above six feet were trained in fall hazards and the procedures to be followed to minimize such hazards. Beaudoin, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1494565, citation number1, item number 2b and was affirmed as a final order on 08 December 2020, with respect to a workplace located at 427 Howe Avenue, Shelton, CT 06484.
Recent events (2)
- — I (R) $3828.3
- — Z (R) $5469
More inspections at Beaudoin, INC.
View Beaudoin, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345706949.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.